2010Zeitschrift für GastroenterologieRequires access

Liver stiffness in obese patients: First experience using the novel XL probe for vibration-controlled transient elastography

E Durango, Gunda Millonig, HK Seitz, Sophia Mueller

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Aims: Measurement of liver stiffness (LS) by vibration-controlled transient elastography [VCTE/Fibroscan] is limited in patients with obesity and ascites. We here test and compare the recently developed more powerful XL probe versus the conventional M probe. Methods: LS was measured in 80 obese and non-obese patients (BMI range 17.2–72.4) using both the M and XL probe. In addition, BMI, waist to hip ratio, transaminases and basic liver ultrasound parameters were obtained. Results: LS was not measurable in 3 patients (3.7%) by the XL probe as compared to 23 patients (28.7%) by the M probe. At a BMI>33, hardly any patient could be measured using the M probe. Out of the 3 patients not measurable with the XL probe, two had a BMI>40 and one was non obese. LS measurement failure in non obese patients was in one case due to ascites but mainly to a specific type of subcutaneaous fat tissue with poor ultrasound propagation. LS by M and XL probe were highly correlated (r=0.98, P<0.01). The maximum difference between LS measured with M-probe compared to XL-probe was 30% in patients with an increased LS>8 kPa. Bilirubin and waist-to-hip ratio but not BMI correlated with LS in both probes (r=0.40 and r=0.47, P<0.01). Discussion and conclusion: The novel more powerful XL probe drastically improves the success rate of LS measurements in patients with obesity and ascites. Patients with a BMI above 40 and lean patients with a specific type of subcutaneous fat tissue with poor ultrasound penetration are still problematic despite the use of the XL-probe.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aims: Measurement of liver stiffness (LS) by vibration-controlled transient elastography [VCTE/Fibroscan] is limited in patients with obesity and ascites. We here test and compare the recently developed more powerful XL probe versus the conventional M probe. Methods: LS was measured in 80 obese and non-obese patients (BMI range 17.2–72.4) using both the M and XL probe. In addition, BMI, waist to hip ratio, transaminases and basic liver ultrasound parameters were obtained. Results: LS was not measurable in 3 patients (3.7%) by the XL probe as compared to 23 patients (28.7%) by the M probe. At a BMI>33, hardly any patient could be measured using the M probe. Out of the 3 patients not measurable with the XL probe, two had a BMI>40 and one was non obese. LS measurement failure in non obese patients was in one case due to ascites but mainly to a specific type of subcutaneaous fat tissue with poor ultrasound propagation. LS by M and XL probe were highly correlated (r=0.98, P<0.01). The maximum difference between LS measured with M-probe compared to XL-probe was 30% in patients with an increased LS>8 kPa. Bilirubin and waist-to-hip ratio but not BMI correlated with LS in both probes (r=0.40 and r=0.47, P<0.01). Discussion and conclusion: The novel more powerful XL probe drastically improves the success rate of LS measurements in patients with obesity and ascites. Patients with a BMI above 40 and lean patients with a specific type of subcutaneous fat tissue with poor ultrasound penetration are still problematic despite the use of the XL-probe.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aims: Measurement of liver stiffness (LS) by vibration-controlled transient elastography [VCTE/Fibroscan] is limited in patients with obesity and ascites. We here test and compare the recently developed more powerful XL probe versus the conventional M probe. Methods: LS was measured in 80 obese and non-obese patients (BMI range 17.2–72.4) using both the M and XL probe. In addition, BMI, waist to hip ratio, transaminases and basic liver ultrasound parameters were obtained. Results: LS was not measurable in 3 patients (3.7%) by the XL probe as compared to 23 patients (28.7%) by the M probe. At a BMI>33, hardly any patient could be measured using the M probe. Out of the 3 patients not measurable with the XL probe, two had a BMI>40 and one was non obese. LS measurement failure in non obese patients was in one case due to ascites but mainly to a specific type of subcutaneaous fat tissue with poor ultrasound propagation. LS by M and XL probe were highly correlated (r=0.98, P<0.01). The maximum difference between LS measured with M-probe compared to XL-probe was 30% in patients with an increased LS>8 kPa. Bilirubin and waist-to-hip ratio but not BMI correlated with LS in both probes (r=0.40 and r=0.47, P<0.01). Discussion and conclusion: The novel more powerful XL probe drastically improves the success rate of LS measurements in patients with obesity and ascites. Patients with a BMI above 40 and lean patients with a specific type of subcutaneous fat tissue with poor ultrasound penetration are still problematic despite the use of the XL-probe.

Key concepts: Transient elastography, Stiffness, Medicine, Ascites, Vibration, Transient (computer programming), Elastography, Biomedical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Liver stiffness in obese patients: First experience using the novel XL probe for vibration-controlled transient elastography — Research Paper | ScholarLens