2006Geological Society London Special PublicationsRequires access

Permian tetrapod footprints: biostratigraphy and biochronology

Spencer G. Lucas, Adrian P. Hunt

Open publisher page 27 citations

Abstract

Abstract Permian tetrapod footprints are known from localities in North America, South America, Europe and Africa. These footprints comprise four ichnofacies, theChelichnusichnofacies from aeolianites and theBatrachichnus, BrontopodusandCharacichnosichnofacies from water-laid (mostly red-bed) strata. Permian track assemblages of theChelichnusichnofacies are of uniform ichnogeneric composition and low diversity, range in age from Early to Late Permian, and thus are of no biostratigraphic significance. Footprints of theBatrachichnusandBrontopodusichnofacies represent two biostratigraphically distinct assemblages: (1) Early Permian assemblages characterized byAmphisauropus, Batrachichnus, Dimetropus, Dromopus, Hyloidichnus, LimnopusandVaranopus; and (2) Middle to Late Permian assemblages characterized byBrontopus, Dicynodontipus, Lunaepes, Pachypes, Planipes, and/orRhynchosauroides. Few Permian footprint assemblages are demonstrably of Middle Permian (Guadalupian) age, and there is a global gap in the footprint record equivalent to at least Roadian time. Permian tetrapod footprints represent only two biostratigraphically distinct assemblages, an Early Permian pelycosaur assemblage and a Middle to Late Permian therapsid assemblage. Therefore, footprints provide a global Permian biochronology of only two time intervals, much less than the ten time intervals that can be distinguished with tetrapod body fossils.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Permian tetrapod footprints are known from localities in North America, South America, Europe and Africa. These footprints comprise four ichnofacies, theChelichnusichnofacies from aeolianites and theBatrachichnus, BrontopodusandCharacichnosichnofacies from water-laid (mostly red-bed) strata. Permian track assemblages of theChelichnusichnofacies are of uniform ichnogeneric composition and low diversity, range in age from Early to Late Permian, and thus are of no biostratigraphic significance. Footprints of theBatrachichnusandBrontopodusichnofacies represent two biostratigraphically distinct assemblages: (1) Early Permian assemblages characterized byAmphisauropus, Batrachichnus, Dimetropus, Dromopus, Hyloidichnus, LimnopusandVaranopus; and (2) Middle to Late Permian assemblages characterized byBrontopus, Dicynodontipus, Lunaepes, Pachypes, Planipes, and/orRhynchosauroides. Few Permian footprint assemblages are demonstrably of Middle Permian (Guadalupian) age, and there is a global gap in the footprint record equivalent to at least Roadian time. Permian tetrapod footprints represent only two biostratigraphically distinct assemblages, an Early Permian pelycosaur assemblage and a Middle to Late Permian therapsid assemblage. Therefore, footprints provide a global Permian biochronology of only two time intervals, much less than the ten time intervals that can be distinguished with tetrapod body fossils.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Permian tetrapod footprints are known from localities in North America, South America, Europe and Africa. These footprints comprise four ichnofacies, theChelichnusichnofacies from aeolianites and theBatrachichnus, BrontopodusandCharacichnosichnofacies from water-laid (mostly red-bed) strata. Permian track assemblages of theChelichnusichnofacies are of uniform ichnogeneric composition and low diversity, range in age from Early to Late Permian, and thus are of no biostratigraphic significance. Footprints of theBatrachichnusandBrontopodusichnofacies represent two biostratigraphically distinct assemblages: (1) Early Permian assemblages characterized byAmphisauropus, Batrachichnus, Dimetropus, Dromopus, Hyloidichnus, LimnopusandVaranopus; and (2) Middle to Late Permian assemblages characterized byBrontopus, Dicynodontipus, Lunaepes, Pachypes, Planipes, and/orRhynchosauroides. Few Permian footprint assemblages are demonstrably of Middle Permian (Guadalupian) age, and there is a global gap in the footprint record equivalent to at least Roadian time. Permian tetrapod footprints represent only two biostratigraphically distinct assemblages, an Early Permian pelycosaur assemblage and a Middle to Late Permian therapsid assemblage. Therefore, footprints provide a global Permian biochronology of only two time intervals, much less than the ten time intervals that can be distinguished with tetrapod body fossils.

Key concepts: Tetrapod (structure), Biochronology, Paleontology, Permian, Biostratigraphy, Geology, Structural basin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Permian tetrapod footprints: biostratigraphy and biochronology — Research Paper | ScholarLens