1990Unpublished venueRequires access

The Light Infantry Division Regionally Focused for Low Intensity Conflict

Davis, S Lauren

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : This study examines the utility of regionally focusing a light infantry division to maximize its effectiveness for low intensity conflict (LIC) . The light infantry divisions (LID) are the US Army's most strategically deployable divisions and train for contingencies worldwide. This study first explores why the light infantry division currently exists within the US force structure and its relationship to the spectrum of conflict, especially low intensity conflict. This study concludes that the light infantry division should be tied directly to CINCs who are involved in low intensity conflict. CINCs could ensure that mission essential training tasks for the specific region are the priority, conditions, and standards for training tailored to the region, and distractors that are not regionally LIC related are eliminated. The end result is a light infantry division that is better prepared to support complex political-military contingencies. Keywords: Division level organizations, Army operations, Counterinsurgency, Low intensity conflict, Military forces (United States), Light infantry, Light infantry division, Infantry, Low intensity conflict, Guerrilla warfare, Counterinsurgency, Revolutionary warfare, Contingency operations, Foreign internal defense, Joint strategic capabilities plan, Combatant commanders, Latin America. (rj)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : This study examines the utility of regionally focusing a light infantry division to maximize its effectiveness for low intensity conflict (LIC) . The light infantry divisions (LID) are the US Army's most strategically deployable divisions and train for contingencies worldwide. This study first explores why the light infantry division currently exists within the US force structure and its relationship to the spectrum of conflict, especially low intensity conflict. This study concludes that the light infantry division should be tied directly to CINCs who are involved in low intensity conflict. CINCs could ensure that mission essential training tasks for the specific region are the priority, conditions, and standards for training tailored to the region, and distractors that are not regionally LIC related are eliminated. The end result is a light infantry division that is better prepared to support complex political-military contingencies. Keywords: Division level organizations, Army operations, Counterinsurgency, Low intensity conflict, Military forces (United States), Light infantry, Light infantry division, Infantry, Low intensity conflict, Guerrilla warfare, Counterinsurgency, Revolutionary warfare, Contingency operations, Foreign internal defense, Joint strategic capabilities plan, Combatant commanders, Latin America. (rj)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : This study examines the utility of regionally focusing a light infantry division to maximize its effectiveness for low intensity conflict (LIC) . The light infantry divisions (LID) are the US Army's most strategically deployable divisions and train for contingencies worldwide. This study first explores why the light infantry division currently exists within the US force structure and its relationship to the spectrum of conflict, especially low intensity conflict. This study concludes that the light infantry division should be tied directly to CINCs who are involved in low intensity conflict. CINCs could ensure that mission essential training tasks for the specific region are the priority, conditions, and standards for training tailored to the region, and distractors that are not regionally LIC related are eliminated. The end result is a light infantry division that is better prepared to support complex political-military contingencies. Keywords: Division level organizations, Army operations, Counterinsurgency, Low intensity conflict, Military forces (United States), Light infantry, Light infantry division, Infantry, Low intensity conflict, Guerrilla warfare, Counterinsurgency, Revolutionary warfare, Contingency operations, Foreign internal defense, Joint strategic capabilities plan, Combatant commanders, Latin America. (rj)

Key concepts: Infantry, Division (mathematics), Combatant, Engineering, Operability, Contingency, Operations management, Management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Light Infantry Division Regionally Focused for Low Intensity Conflict — Research Paper | ScholarLens