2003Frontiers in OpticsRequires access

Finite difference frequency domain method: Maxwell equation solutions for optical engineering applications

Juuso Olkkonen, Kari Kataja, Janne Aikio, Dennis G. Howe

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Scalar diffraction theory is not applicable to electromagnetic problems in which structural (light scattering) elements have size comparable to the incident light wavelength. Such problems are usually handled by finding rigorous solutions of Maxwell’s equations. During the last decade, the Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) method, which provides a time-evolving simulation of the scattered light field (by solving Maxwell’s equations), has become a popular tool for treating optical problems involving micro- and nano-structures. And, even though the FDTD is applicable to problems involving wideband optical sources, it is extensively used to obtain quiescent solutions under monochromatic illumination. In the latter case, steady state solutions to Maxwell’s equations can also be found via the Finite Difference Frequency Domain (FD2) method. FD2 has some specific advantages compared to FDTD. FDTD and FD2 are compared in the sequel.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Scalar diffraction theory is not applicable to electromagnetic problems in which structural (light scattering) elements have size comparable to the incident light wavelength. Such problems are usually handled by finding rigorous solutions of Maxwell’s equations. During the last decade, the Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) method, which provides a time-evolving simulation of the scattered light field (by solving Maxwell’s equations), has become a popular tool for treating optical problems involving micro- and nano-structures. And, even though the FDTD is applicable to problems involving wideband optical sources, it is extensively used to obtain quiescent solutions under monochromatic illumination. In the latter case, steady state solutions to Maxwell’s equations can also be found via the Finite Difference Frequency Domain (FD2) method. FD2 has some specific advantages compared to FDTD. FDTD and FD2 are compared in the sequel.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Scalar diffraction theory is not applicable to electromagnetic problems in which structural (light scattering) elements have size comparable to the incident light wavelength. Such problems are usually handled by finding rigorous solutions of Maxwell’s equations. During the last decade, the Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) method, which provides a time-evolving simulation of the scattered light field (by solving Maxwell’s equations), has become a popular tool for treating optical problems involving micro- and nano-structures. And, even though the FDTD is applicable to problems involving wideband optical sources, it is extensively used to obtain quiescent solutions under monochromatic illumination. In the latter case, steady state solutions to Maxwell’s equations can also be found via the Finite Difference Frequency Domain (FD2) method. FD2 has some specific advantages compared to FDTD. FDTD and FD2 are compared in the sequel.

Key concepts: Finite-difference time-domain method, Maxwell's equations, Scattering-matrix method, Electromagnetic field solver, Finite difference method, Physics, Electromagnetic field, Electromagnetic radiation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Finite difference frequency domain method: Maxwell equation solutions for optical engineering applications — Research Paper | ScholarLens