The faculty and continuing medical education
Joanna Lein, T J Cullen, Ashley Liston, Peter Lind
Abstract
Joanna Lein, T J Cullen, Ashley Liston, Peter Lind
Abstract
Meager or nonexistent faculty reward systems hamper continuing medical education (CME) programs conducted by U.S. medial schools. In light of a growing number of mandatory CME regulations and a consequent increase in physician attendance of CME programs, the need for a competent faculty is apparent. A survey of faculty members designed to ascertain the importance of a faculty reward system was conducted by the University of Washington Division of Continuing Medical Education. Results reveal that faculty members are twice as likely to teach in CME programs outside of the university system as within the system. Survey respondents of nonprofessor rand considered faculty advancement the single greatest source of encouragement to participate in CME programs, yet this participation is seldom considered by the university in evaluations for promotion or tenure. If medical schools are to accept a responsibility for the continuing education of medical professionals, a commitment to provide adequate faculty incentive is imperative.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Meager or nonexistent faculty reward systems hamper continuing medical education (CME) programs conducted by U.S. medial schools. In light of a growing number of mandatory CME regulations and a consequent increase in physician attendance of CME programs, the need for a competent faculty is apparent. A survey of faculty members designed to ascertain the importance of a faculty reward system was conducted by the University of Washington Division of Continuing Medical Education. Results reveal that faculty members are twice as likely to teach in CME programs outside of the university system as within the system. Survey respondents of nonprofessor rand considered faculty advancement the single greatest source of encouragement to participate in CME programs, yet this participation is seldom considered by the university in evaluations for promotion or tenure. If medical schools are to accept a responsibility for the continuing education of medical professionals, a commitment to provide adequate faculty incentive is imperative.
Key concepts: Attendance, Continuing medical education, Medical education, Incentive, Promotion (chess), Continuing education, Faculty development, Higher education