2012Injury PreventionOpen access

TRAMPOLINE INJURY PREVENTION – CAN ‘FALL-OFF’ AND ‘FALL-ONTO’ INJURIES BE ELIMINATED WITH GOOD PRODUCT DESIGN?

David Eager, Carolyn Riley Chapman

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Background Injuries from trampoline related accidents place a heavy burden on society directly through suffering among children and adolescents and indirectly via the costs associated with hospital admissions and emergency department presentations. In Australia, trampoline injuries represent approximately 25% of all childhood play equipment related injuries. Of these injuries the ‘fall-off’ trampoline (25%) and ‘fall-onto’ the trampoline (60-80%) represent the most frequent and serious injuries. Objectives The objective of this study was to verify whether good engineering design leads to a reduction in ‘fall-off’ and ‘fall-onto’ trampoline injuries. Methods A survey of trampoline injuries was undertaken by contacting users of trampolines where the trampolines had been specifically designed to eliminate ‘fall-off’ and ‘fall-onto’ injuries. Results The results from 3817 users of trampolines that had been engineered to eliminate ‘fall-off’ and ‘fall-onto’ injuries were compared with published ‘traditional’ trampoline injury data. A significantly lower proportion of injuries were noted from trampolines that had been engineered with soft-edges and effective enclosures for both ‘fall-off’ and ‘fall-onto’. Significance This research confirms that with appropriate engineering design interventions both the frequency and severity of trampoline injuries can be significantly reduced.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background Injuries from trampoline related accidents place a heavy burden on society directly through suffering among children and adolescents and indirectly via the costs associated with hospital admissions and emergency department presentations. In Australia, trampoline injuries represent approximately 25% of all childhood play equipment related injuries. Of these injuries the ‘fall-off’ trampoline (25%) and ‘fall-onto’ the trampoline (60-80%) represent the most frequent and serious injuries. Objectives The objective of this study was to verify whether good engineering design leads to a reduction in ‘fall-off’ and ‘fall-onto’ trampoline injuries. Methods A survey of trampoline injuries was undertaken by contacting users of trampolines where the trampolines had been specifically designed to eliminate ‘fall-off’ and ‘fall-onto’ injuries. Results The results from 3817 users of trampolines that had been engineered to eliminate ‘fall-off’ and ‘fall-onto’ injuries were compared with published ‘traditional’ trampoline injury data. A significantly lower proportion of injuries were noted from trampolines that had been engineered with soft-edges and effective enclosures for both ‘fall-off’ and ‘fall-onto’. Significance This research confirms that with appropriate engineering design interventions both the frequency and severity of trampoline injuries can be significantly reduced.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background Injuries from trampoline related accidents place a heavy burden on society directly through suffering among children and adolescents and indirectly via the costs associated with hospital admissions and emergency department presentations. In Australia, trampoline injuries represent approximately 25% of all childhood play equipment related injuries. Of these injuries the ‘fall-off’ trampoline (25%) and ‘fall-onto’ the trampoline (60-80%) represent the most frequent and serious injuries. Objectives The objective of this study was to verify whether good engineering design leads to a reduction in ‘fall-off’ and ‘fall-onto’ trampoline injuries. Methods A survey of trampoline injuries was undertaken by contacting users of trampolines where the trampolines had been specifically designed to eliminate ‘fall-off’ and ‘fall-onto’ injuries. Results The results from 3817 users of trampolines that had been engineered to eliminate ‘fall-off’ and ‘fall-onto’ injuries were compared with published ‘traditional’ trampoline injury data. A significantly lower proportion of injuries were noted from trampolines that had been engineered with soft-edges and effective enclosures for both ‘fall-off’ and ‘fall-onto’. Significance This research confirms that with appropriate engineering design interventions both the frequency and severity of trampoline injuries can be significantly reduced.

Key concepts: Trampoline, Poison control, Injury prevention, Engineering, Human factors and ergonomics, Suicide prevention, Occupational safety and health, Forensic engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TRAMPOLINE INJURY PREVENTION – CAN ‘FALL-OFF’ AND ‘FALL-ONTO’ INJURIES BE ELIMINATED WITH GOOD PRODUCT DESIGN? — Research Paper | ScholarLens