2009•DigestionRequires access

Cryptogenic Chronic Liver Disease and Serum or Liver Hepatitis B Virus Markers

Giulio Diodati, Patrizia Pontisso, Paola Bonetti, Duilio Stenico, Franco Noventa, Alfredo Alberti, Giuseppe Realdi

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

In an attempt to evaluate a possible correlation between cryptogenic chronic liver disease and a present or past hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, we studied 17 patients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative, nonalcoholic chronic liver disease; 9 of them were positive for serum HBsAg detected by a solid-phase enzyme immunoassay with monoclonal antibody (M-EIA) and 8 were negative for the same marker. Liver hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg), studied by an indirect immunofluorescence technique, was present in 55.5% of the patients positive for serum HBsAg by M-EIA. In the same group of patients, liver HBV-DNA was found in 66.6% of the patients. On the other hand, only 1 patient without serum positivity for HBsAg by M-EIA was positive for liver HBcAg and HBV-DNA. None of our patients showed serum positivity for HBV-DNA sequences. We conclude that HBV infection may be a possible cause of cryptogenic chronic liver disease; this HBV-related, HBsAg-negative chronic liver disease seems to have no viral replication or undetectable levels of HBV-DNA in serum. HBsAg, detected by a monoclonal assay, seems to be a suitable marker to identify this subgroup of patients with HBsAg-negative chronic liver disease.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In an attempt to evaluate a possible correlation between cryptogenic chronic liver disease and a present or past hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, we studied 17 patients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative, nonalcoholic chronic liver disease; 9 of them were positive for serum HBsAg detected by a solid-phase enzyme immunoassay with monoclonal antibody (M-EIA) and 8 were negative for the same marker. Liver hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg), studied by an indirect immunofluorescence technique, was present in 55.5% of the patients positive for serum HBsAg by M-EIA. In the same group of patients, liver HBV-DNA was found in 66.6% of the patients. On the other hand, only 1 patient without serum positivity for HBsAg by M-EIA was positive for liver HBcAg and HBV-DNA. None of our patients showed serum positivity for HBV-DNA sequences. We conclude that HBV infection may be a possible cause of cryptogenic chronic liver disease; this HBV-related, HBsAg-negative chronic liver disease seems to have no viral replication or undetectable levels of HBV-DNA in serum. HBsAg, detected by a monoclonal assay, seems to be a suitable marker to identify this subgroup of patients with HBsAg-negative chronic liver disease.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In an attempt to evaluate a possible correlation between cryptogenic chronic liver disease and a present or past hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, we studied 17 patients with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative, nonalcoholic chronic liver disease; 9 of them were positive for serum HBsAg detected by a solid-phase enzyme immunoassay with monoclonal antibody (M-EIA) and 8 were negative for the same marker. Liver hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg), studied by an indirect immunofluorescence technique, was present in 55.5% of the patients positive for serum HBsAg by M-EIA. In the same group of patients, liver HBV-DNA was found in 66.6% of the patients. On the other hand, only 1 patient without serum positivity for HBsAg by M-EIA was positive for liver HBcAg and HBV-DNA. None of our patients showed serum positivity for HBV-DNA sequences. We conclude that HBV infection may be a possible cause of cryptogenic chronic liver disease; this HBV-related, HBsAg-negative chronic liver disease seems to have no viral replication or undetectable levels of HBV-DNA in serum. HBsAg, detected by a monoclonal assay, seems to be a suitable marker to identify this subgroup of patients with HBsAg-negative chronic liver disease.

Key concepts: HBcAg, HBsAg, Medicine, Liver disease, Chronic liver disease, Hepatitis B virus, Immunoassay, Hepatitis B

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cryptogenic Chronic Liver Disease and Serum or Liver Hepatitis B Virus Markers — Research Paper | ScholarLens