2005•The Computer JournalRequires access

Deterministic Identity-Based Signatures for Partial Aggregation

Javier Herranz

Open publisher page 80 citations

Abstract

Aggregate signatures are a useful primitive which allows aggregation into a single and constant-length signature many signatures on different messages computed by different users. Specific proposals of aggregate signature schemes exist only for PKI-based scenarios. For identity-based scenarios, where public keys of the users are directly derived from their identities, the signature schemes proposed up to now do not seem to allow constant-length aggregation. We provide an intermediate solution to this problem, by designing a new identity-based signature scheme which allows aggregation when the signatures to be aggregated come all from the same signer. The new scheme is deterministic and enjoys some better properties than the previous proposals; for example, it allows detection of a possible corruption of the master entity. We formally prove that the scheme is unforgeable, in the random oracle model, assuming that the Computational Diffie–Hellman problem is hard to solve.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aggregate signatures are a useful primitive which allows aggregation into a single and constant-length signature many signatures on different messages computed by different users. Specific proposals of aggregate signature schemes exist only for PKI-based scenarios. For identity-based scenarios, where public keys of the users are directly derived from their identities, the signature schemes proposed up to now do not seem to allow constant-length aggregation. We provide an intermediate solution to this problem, by designing a new identity-based signature scheme which allows aggregation when the signatures to be aggregated come all from the same signer. The new scheme is deterministic and enjoys some better properties than the previous proposals; for example, it allows detection of a possible corruption of the master entity. We formally prove that the scheme is unforgeable, in the random oracle model, assuming that the Computational Diffie–Hellman problem is hard to solve.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 80 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aggregate signatures are a useful primitive which allows aggregation into a single and constant-length signature many signatures on different messages computed by different users. Specific proposals of aggregate signature schemes exist only for PKI-based scenarios. For identity-based scenarios, where public keys of the users are directly derived from their identities, the signature schemes proposed up to now do not seem to allow constant-length aggregation. We provide an intermediate solution to this problem, by designing a new identity-based signature scheme which allows aggregation when the signatures to be aggregated come all from the same signer. The new scheme is deterministic and enjoys some better properties than the previous proposals; for example, it allows detection of a possible corruption of the master entity. We formally prove that the scheme is unforgeable, in the random oracle model, assuming that the Computational Diffie–Hellman problem is hard to solve.

Key concepts: Computer science, Identity (music), Information retrieval, Library science, World Wide Web, Art, Aesthetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Deterministic Identity-Based Signatures for Partial Aggregation — Research Paper | ScholarLens