2010Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIERequires access

Comparison of optical surface roughness measured by stylus profiler, AFM, and white light interferometer using power spectral density

Jianchao Chen, Tao Sun, Jinghe Wang

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Surface roughness measurements were performed on fused-silica, silicon wafer, and glass-ceramic (Zerodur) by mechanical stylus profiler, atomic force microscope (AFM), and white light interferometer (WLI). Because of the differences of spatial frequency bandwidth of the measurement instruments surface roughnesses are actually not directly comparable. In this study, a novel method has been developed to directly compare the roughnesses measured with different instruments using power spectral density (PSD) function which can be calculated from the measurement data. The RMS roughnesses were obtained by integrating areas in the overlapping regions of two or more instruments so that roughnesses measured with different instruments could be directly compared. The agreement among RMS roughnesses measured with the different techniques improved considerably, and the remaining differences could be explained as being caused by surface features to which the instruments responded differently. This fruitful work also provides a great guidance for the selection of surface roughness measurement instruments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Surface roughness measurements were performed on fused-silica, silicon wafer, and glass-ceramic (Zerodur) by mechanical stylus profiler, atomic force microscope (AFM), and white light interferometer (WLI). Because of the differences of spatial frequency bandwidth of the measurement instruments surface roughnesses are actually not directly comparable. In this study, a novel method has been developed to directly compare the roughnesses measured with different instruments using power spectral density (PSD) function which can be calculated from the measurement data. The RMS roughnesses were obtained by integrating areas in the overlapping regions of two or more instruments so that roughnesses measured with different instruments could be directly compared. The agreement among RMS roughnesses measured with the different techniques improved considerably, and the remaining differences could be explained as being caused by surface features to which the instruments responded differently. This fruitful work also provides a great guidance for the selection of surface roughness measurement instruments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Surface roughness measurements were performed on fused-silica, silicon wafer, and glass-ceramic (Zerodur) by mechanical stylus profiler, atomic force microscope (AFM), and white light interferometer (WLI). Because of the differences of spatial frequency bandwidth of the measurement instruments surface roughnesses are actually not directly comparable. In this study, a novel method has been developed to directly compare the roughnesses measured with different instruments using power spectral density (PSD) function which can be calculated from the measurement data. The RMS roughnesses were obtained by integrating areas in the overlapping regions of two or more instruments so that roughnesses measured with different instruments could be directly compared. The agreement among RMS roughnesses measured with the different techniques improved considerably, and the remaining differences could be explained as being caused by surface features to which the instruments responded differently. This fruitful work also provides a great guidance for the selection of surface roughness measurement instruments.

Key concepts: Stylus, White light interferometry, Interferometry, Surface roughness, Materials science, Surface finish, Optics, Profilometer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of optical surface roughness measured by stylus profiler, AFM, and white light interferometer using power spectral density — Research Paper | ScholarLens