2011New England Journal of MedicineRequires access

Underestimating Medical Therapy for Coronary Disease . . . Again

James C. Fang

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

The question of how best to treat patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction has challenged physicians for years. Although most clinicians are comfortable recommending revascularization when there is angina, extensive coronary disease, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of more than 35%,13 the benefits of such a strategy are less clear when the ejection fraction is substantially impaired.The evidence base for the benefits of revascularization is even weaker when angina is not present in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. In such a situation, myocardial viability and hibernation (i.e., chronically hypoperfused myocardium resulting in a hypocontractile . . .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The question of how best to treat patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction has challenged physicians for years. Although most clinicians are comfortable recommending revascularization when there is angina, extensive coronary disease, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of more than 35%,13 the benefits of such a strategy are less clear when the ejection fraction is substantially impaired.The evidence base for the benefits of revascularization is even weaker when angina is not present in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. In such a situation, myocardial viability and hibernation (i.e., chronically hypoperfused myocardium resulting in a hypocontractile . . .

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The question of how best to treat patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction has challenged physicians for years. Although most clinicians are comfortable recommending revascularization when there is angina, extensive coronary disease, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of more than 35%,13 the benefits of such a strategy are less clear when the ejection fraction is substantially impaired.The evidence base for the benefits of revascularization is even weaker when angina is not present in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. In such a situation, myocardial viability and hibernation (i.e., chronically hypoperfused myocardium resulting in a hypocontractile . . .

Key concepts: Medicine, Cardiology, Ejection fraction, Internal medicine, Angina, Coronary artery disease, Revascularization, Ischemic cardiomyopathy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Underestimating Medical Therapy for Coronary Disease . . . Again — Research Paper | ScholarLens