1986Acta OphthalmologicaRequires access

Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia IV. Assessment of vision using vertical and horizontal gratings and optotypes at different contrast levels

Pentti Koskela, Lea Hyvärinen

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

The contrast sensitivity of 49 amblyopic children (mean age 9 years) was measured in the beginning and at the end of a treatment period using both vertical gratings and optotypes (LH-4 contrast test) at 2, 3, 5 and 75% contrast. The contrast sensitivity of 37 patients was also measure using horizontal gratings. The contrast sensitivity of the dominant eyes measured with vertical gratings was generally higher than when measured with horizontal gratings. The difference was statistically significant at spatial frequencies 1 and 6 c/deg. A similar difference was present in the amblyopic eyes only at the spatial frequency 1 c/deg both before and after the treatment. Individual variation was great; in a given patient the relationship between the two measurements varied from one spatial frequency to the next. It has been shown in earlier investigations that contrast sensitivity measurements using gratings reveal important new information in the study of amblyopia. Both tests, used in this investigation, measure visual function in the low contrast domain and improve follow-up of the changes in vision during treatment of amblyopia when used in addition to visual acuity measurements. Low contrast optotype test seems to measure contrast sensitivity in amblyopia closely similarly to the grating test. The slight difference in detecting a 'hidden occlusion amblyopia' at the intermediate spatial frequencies needs further study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The contrast sensitivity of 49 amblyopic children (mean age 9 years) was measured in the beginning and at the end of a treatment period using both vertical gratings and optotypes (LH-4 contrast test) at 2, 3, 5 and 75% contrast. The contrast sensitivity of 37 patients was also measure using horizontal gratings. The contrast sensitivity of the dominant eyes measured with vertical gratings was generally higher than when measured with horizontal gratings. The difference was statistically significant at spatial frequencies 1 and 6 c/deg. A similar difference was present in the amblyopic eyes only at the spatial frequency 1 c/deg both before and after the treatment. Individual variation was great; in a given patient the relationship between the two measurements varied from one spatial frequency to the next. It has been shown in earlier investigations that contrast sensitivity measurements using gratings reveal important new information in the study of amblyopia. Both tests, used in this investigation, measure visual function in the low contrast domain and improve follow-up of the changes in vision during treatment of amblyopia when used in addition to visual acuity measurements. Low contrast optotype test seems to measure contrast sensitivity in amblyopia closely similarly to the grating test. The slight difference in detecting a 'hidden occlusion amblyopia' at the intermediate spatial frequencies needs further study.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The contrast sensitivity of 49 amblyopic children (mean age 9 years) was measured in the beginning and at the end of a treatment period using both vertical gratings and optotypes (LH-4 contrast test) at 2, 3, 5 and 75% contrast. The contrast sensitivity of 37 patients was also measure using horizontal gratings. The contrast sensitivity of the dominant eyes measured with vertical gratings was generally higher than when measured with horizontal gratings. The difference was statistically significant at spatial frequencies 1 and 6 c/deg. A similar difference was present in the amblyopic eyes only at the spatial frequency 1 c/deg both before and after the treatment. Individual variation was great; in a given patient the relationship between the two measurements varied from one spatial frequency to the next. It has been shown in earlier investigations that contrast sensitivity measurements using gratings reveal important new information in the study of amblyopia. Both tests, used in this investigation, measure visual function in the low contrast domain and improve follow-up of the changes in vision during treatment of amblyopia when used in addition to visual acuity measurements. Low contrast optotype test seems to measure contrast sensitivity in amblyopia closely similarly to the grating test. The slight difference in detecting a 'hidden occlusion amblyopia' at the intermediate spatial frequencies needs further study.

Key concepts: Contrast (vision), Spatial frequency, Optics, Grating, Sensitivity (control systems), High contrast, Optometry, Vision test

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia IV. Assessment of vision using vertical and horizontal gratings and optotypes at different contrast levels — Research Paper | ScholarLens