Optimum UV Disinfection between Concentric Cylinders
Zhou Ye Ye, Larry J. Forney, Tatiana Koutchma, Aklilu T. G. Giorges, John A. Pierson
Abstract
Zhou Ye Ye, Larry J. Forney, Tatiana Koutchma, Aklilu T. G. Giorges, John A. Pierson
Abstract
To optimize UV disinfection of microbes between concentric cylinders, inactivation in the plug flow reactor geometries of laminar Poiseuille flow, turbulent flow, and laminar Taylor−Couette flow is investigated experimentally and numerically. It is found that there is an optimum ratio of radiation penetration depth to gap width λ/ d for each of the three flow patterns. The optimum λ/ d for laminar Poiseuille flow, turbulent flow, and laminar Taylor−Couette flow are 1.5, 1, and 0.5, respectively. It is also concluded that laminar Poiseuille flow provides inferior (small) inactivation levels while laminar Taylor−Couette flow provides superior (large) inactivation levels. The relative inactivation levels are as follows: laminar Poiseuille flow < turbulent flow < laminar Taylor−Couette flow.
OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
To optimize UV disinfection of microbes between concentric cylinders, inactivation in the plug flow reactor geometries of laminar Poiseuille flow, turbulent flow, and laminar Taylor−Couette flow is investigated experimentally and numerically. It is found that there is an optimum ratio of radiation penetration depth to gap width λ/ d for each of the three flow patterns. The optimum λ/ d for laminar Poiseuille flow, turbulent flow, and laminar Taylor−Couette flow are 1.5, 1, and 0.5, respectively. It is also concluded that laminar Poiseuille flow provides inferior (small) inactivation levels while laminar Taylor−Couette flow provides superior (large) inactivation levels. The relative inactivation levels are as follows: laminar Poiseuille flow < turbulent flow < laminar Taylor−Couette flow.
Key concepts: Laminar flow, Hagen–Poiseuille equation, Taylor–Couette flow, Turbulence, Plug flow, Couette flow, Laminar flow reactor, Mechanics