The future of phylogeny reconstruction
James S. Farris
Abstract
James S. Farris
Abstract
A new approach to phylogenetic analysis, parsimony jackknifing, uses simple parsimony calculations combined with resampling of characters to arrive at a tree comprising well‐supported groups. This is usually much the same as the consensus of most‐parsimonious trees found from extensive multiple‐tree calculations, but the new method is thousands of times faster, allowing analysis of much larger data matrices, and also provides information on the strength of support for different groups. Jackknife frequencies provide a more reliable assessment of support than do alternative methods, notably “confidence probability” (CP) and T‐PTP testing.
OpenAlex reports 61 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A new approach to phylogenetic analysis, parsimony jackknifing, uses simple parsimony calculations combined with resampling of characters to arrive at a tree comprising well‐supported groups. This is usually much the same as the consensus of most‐parsimonious trees found from extensive multiple‐tree calculations, but the new method is thousands of times faster, allowing analysis of much larger data matrices, and also provides information on the strength of support for different groups. Jackknife frequencies provide a more reliable assessment of support than do alternative methods, notably “confidence probability” (CP) and T‐PTP testing.
Key concepts: Jackknife resampling, Resampling, Maximum parsimony, Phylogenetic tree, Biology, Tree (set theory), Phylogenetics, Confidence interval