2002Review of Public Personnel AdministrationRequires access

Public Employment in Georgia State Agencies

Christine L. Kuykendall, Rex L. Facer

Open publisher page 27 citations

Abstract

Georgia’s 1996 elimination of merit protections for newly hired employees challenges the legal protections that act as a barrier to unfettered government action. This article reviews the implications of Georgia’s reforms in light of constitutional protections and judicial precedent. Although this reform effort sought to avoid employees’ procedural due process rights by eliminating merit status for newly hired employees, federal and state judicial decisions indicate that those rights may not be so easy to extinguish. The most pressing challenge involves the constitutional right to due process. The Supreme Court has determined that public employment may rise to the level of a property right, requiring procedural due process. The courts have used a variety of standards to confer a property right interest, including the existence of language in policy and procedure manuals. Accordingly, many of Georgia’s agencies may have unknowingly promulgated employee regulations that lead to the expectation of a property right in continued employment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Georgia’s 1996 elimination of merit protections for newly hired employees challenges the legal protections that act as a barrier to unfettered government action. This article reviews the implications of Georgia’s reforms in light of constitutional protections and judicial precedent. Although this reform effort sought to avoid employees’ procedural due process rights by eliminating merit status for newly hired employees, federal and state judicial decisions indicate that those rights may not be so easy to extinguish. The most pressing challenge involves the constitutional right to due process. The Supreme Court has determined that public employment may rise to the level of a property right, requiring procedural due process. The courts have used a variety of standards to confer a property right interest, including the existence of language in policy and procedure manuals. Accordingly, many of Georgia’s agencies may have unknowingly promulgated employee regulations that lead to the expectation of a property right in continued employment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Georgia’s 1996 elimination of merit protections for newly hired employees challenges the legal protections that act as a barrier to unfettered government action. This article reviews the implications of Georgia’s reforms in light of constitutional protections and judicial precedent. Although this reform effort sought to avoid employees’ procedural due process rights by eliminating merit status for newly hired employees, federal and state judicial decisions indicate that those rights may not be so easy to extinguish. The most pressing challenge involves the constitutional right to due process. The Supreme Court has determined that public employment may rise to the level of a property right, requiring procedural due process. The courts have used a variety of standards to confer a property right interest, including the existence of language in policy and procedure manuals. Accordingly, many of Georgia’s agencies may have unknowingly promulgated employee regulations that lead to the expectation of a property right in continued employment.

Key concepts: Supreme court, Constitutional right, Due process, State (computer science), Property rights, Law, Government (linguistics), Judicial review

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public Employment in Georgia State Agencies — Research Paper | ScholarLens