1982AAPG BulletinRequires access

Principles of Dipmeter Interpretation in Fluvial Systems: ABSTRACT

Dwight Stanley Kranz

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Identification of fluvial reservoirs has become increasingly more important in exploration. Stratigraphic information provided by dipmeter data is useful in defining the fluvial facies and reservoir morphology. Field studies utilizing dipmeter data indicate that the middle Bartlesville sandstones in southeast Kansas and northeast Oklahoma are fluvial in origin and are composed of point-bar and longitudinal-bar facies. Dipmeter patterns within composite bedsets of each facies display a decrease in dip upward. This pattern indicates an upward decrease in the scale of sedimentary structures from cross-laminated to ripple-laminated End_Page 245------------------------------ sandstones as displayed in cores. The composite bedsets of the point-bar facies are significantly thicker than the bedsets of the longitudinal-bar facies. The thinly stacked nature of the longitudinal-bar composite bedsets produce an apparent random dip pattern. However, individual bedsets within the sequence show a decrease in dip upward. Azimuth-frequency plots of cross-bed dip directions yield valuable information on the reservoir morphology. A unidirectional azimuth pattern indicates a predominant paleocurrent direction characteristic of point-bar deposition. Longitudinal-bar sandstones produce a multidirectional azimuth pattern due to stream bifurcation. However, the general paleocurrent direction can be determined from a weighted average of the azimuths. The local sandstone trend of each facies is in the direction of the paleocurrent. Azimuth-frequency plots of the overlying shale drape are 90° out of phase with the paleocurrent direction, indicating that the thicker sandstones of the trend lie in the opposite dip direction of the shale drape. Paleogeographic reconstructions based on paleocurrent and shale-dr pe data show that the point-bar facies has a broadly arcuate, dip-trending morphology of high sinuosity, and the longitudinal-bar facies has a gently curving, dip-trending morphology or low sinuosity. End_of_Article - Last_Page 246------------

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Identification of fluvial reservoirs has become increasingly more important in exploration. Stratigraphic information provided by dipmeter data is useful in defining the fluvial facies and reservoir morphology. Field studies utilizing dipmeter data indicate that the middle Bartlesville sandstones in southeast Kansas and northeast Oklahoma are fluvial in origin and are composed of point-bar and longitudinal-bar facies. Dipmeter patterns within composite bedsets of each facies display a decrease in dip upward. This pattern indicates an upward decrease in the scale of sedimentary structures from cross-laminated to ripple-laminated End_Page 245------------------------------ sandstones as displayed in cores. The composite bedsets of the point-bar facies are significantly thicker than the bedsets of the longitudinal-bar facies. The thinly stacked nature of the longitudinal-bar composite bedsets produce an apparent random dip pattern. However, individual bedsets within the sequence show a decrease in dip upward. Azimuth-frequency plots of cross-bed dip directions yield valuable information on the reservoir morphology. A unidirectional azimuth pattern indicates a predominant paleocurrent direction characteristic of point-bar deposition. Longitudinal-bar sandstones produce a multidirectional azimuth pattern due to stream bifurcation. However, the general paleocurrent direction can be determined from a weighted average of the azimuths. The local sandstone trend of each facies is in the direction of the paleocurrent. Azimuth-frequency plots of the overlying shale drape are 90° out of phase with the paleocurrent direction, indicating that the thicker sandstones of the trend lie in the opposite dip direction of the shale drape. Paleogeographic reconstructions based on paleocurrent and shale-dr pe data show that the point-bar facies has a broadly arcuate, dip-trending morphology of high sinuosity, and the longitudinal-bar facies has a gently curving, dip-trending morphology or low sinuosity. End_of_Article - Last_Page 246------------

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Identification of fluvial reservoirs has become increasingly more important in exploration. Stratigraphic information provided by dipmeter data is useful in defining the fluvial facies and reservoir morphology. Field studies utilizing dipmeter data indicate that the middle Bartlesville sandstones in southeast Kansas and northeast Oklahoma are fluvial in origin and are composed of point-bar and longitudinal-bar facies. Dipmeter patterns within composite bedsets of each facies display a decrease in dip upward. This pattern indicates an upward decrease in the scale of sedimentary structures from cross-laminated to ripple-laminated End_Page 245------------------------------ sandstones as displayed in cores. The composite bedsets of the point-bar facies are significantly thicker than the bedsets of the longitudinal-bar facies. The thinly stacked nature of the longitudinal-bar composite bedsets produce an apparent random dip pattern. However, individual bedsets within the sequence show a decrease in dip upward. Azimuth-frequency plots of cross-bed dip directions yield valuable information on the reservoir morphology. A unidirectional azimuth pattern indicates a predominant paleocurrent direction characteristic of point-bar deposition. Longitudinal-bar sandstones produce a multidirectional azimuth pattern due to stream bifurcation. However, the general paleocurrent direction can be determined from a weighted average of the azimuths. The local sandstone trend of each facies is in the direction of the paleocurrent. Azimuth-frequency plots of the overlying shale drape are 90° out of phase with the paleocurrent direction, indicating that the thicker sandstones of the trend lie in the opposite dip direction of the shale drape. Paleogeographic reconstructions based on paleocurrent and shale-dr pe data show that the point-bar facies has a broadly arcuate, dip-trending morphology of high sinuosity, and the longitudinal-bar facies has a gently curving, dip-trending morphology or low sinuosity. End_of_Article - Last_Page 246------------

Key concepts: Geology, Fluvial, Interpretation (philosophy), Paleontology, Computer science, Programming language, Structural basin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Principles of Dipmeter Interpretation in Fluvial Systems: ABSTRACT — Research Paper | ScholarLens