2008Journal of Dual DiagnosisRequires access

Does a History of Alcohol Use Disorder Affect Response to Antidepressant Medication in Patients With Dysthymic Disorder?

Bachaar Arnaout, Sarai Batchelder, Richard N. Rosenthal, Steven E. Hyler, David J. Hellerstein

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Research on the relationship between depression and alcohol use disorder in remission has been scarce. The authors examined whether a lifetime history of alcohol use disorder affected response to antidepressant treatment of dysthymic disorder (DD) in adult outpatients. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from previous prospective medication trials. Data from 123 subjects with DD were included. Subjects were categorized into 2 groups: (1) no lifetime alcohol use disorder (NLAUD) (n = 99) and (2) lifetime alcohol use disorder (LAUD) (n = 24). None of the subjects met criteria for alcohol use disorder for 6 months prior to intake. Rating scales from baseline and after 8 weeks of pharmacotherapy were collected. Results: After 8 weeks of treatment, the NLAUD and LAUD groups did not differ in rates of response or remission, despite significantly higher baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)-24 scores in the LAUD group. We also found a greater decrease in symptoms in the LAUD group, as measured by the HDRS-24. Conclusions: Our preliminary findings suggest that DD in remitted alcoholics is at least as responsive to pharmacotherapy as DD in nonalcoholics and support adequate evaluation and treatment of DD in remitted alcoholic patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Research on the relationship between depression and alcohol use disorder in remission has been scarce. The authors examined whether a lifetime history of alcohol use disorder affected response to antidepressant treatment of dysthymic disorder (DD) in adult outpatients. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from previous prospective medication trials. Data from 123 subjects with DD were included. Subjects were categorized into 2 groups: (1) no lifetime alcohol use disorder (NLAUD) (n = 99) and (2) lifetime alcohol use disorder (LAUD) (n = 24). None of the subjects met criteria for alcohol use disorder for 6 months prior to intake. Rating scales from baseline and after 8 weeks of pharmacotherapy were collected. Results: After 8 weeks of treatment, the NLAUD and LAUD groups did not differ in rates of response or remission, despite significantly higher baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)-24 scores in the LAUD group. We also found a greater decrease in symptoms in the LAUD group, as measured by the HDRS-24. Conclusions: Our preliminary findings suggest that DD in remitted alcoholics is at least as responsive to pharmacotherapy as DD in nonalcoholics and support adequate evaluation and treatment of DD in remitted alcoholic patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Research on the relationship between depression and alcohol use disorder in remission has been scarce. The authors examined whether a lifetime history of alcohol use disorder affected response to antidepressant treatment of dysthymic disorder (DD) in adult outpatients. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from previous prospective medication trials. Data from 123 subjects with DD were included. Subjects were categorized into 2 groups: (1) no lifetime alcohol use disorder (NLAUD) (n = 99) and (2) lifetime alcohol use disorder (LAUD) (n = 24). None of the subjects met criteria for alcohol use disorder for 6 months prior to intake. Rating scales from baseline and after 8 weeks of pharmacotherapy were collected. Results: After 8 weeks of treatment, the NLAUD and LAUD groups did not differ in rates of response or remission, despite significantly higher baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)-24 scores in the LAUD group. We also found a greater decrease in symptoms in the LAUD group, as measured by the HDRS-24. Conclusions: Our preliminary findings suggest that DD in remitted alcoholics is at least as responsive to pharmacotherapy as DD in nonalcoholics and support adequate evaluation and treatment of DD in remitted alcoholic patients.

Key concepts: Dysthymic Disorder, Alcohol use disorder, Pharmacotherapy, Rating scale, Depression (economics), Psychiatry, Alcohol dependence, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does a History of Alcohol Use Disorder Affect Response to Antidepressant Medication in Patients With Dysthymic Disorder? — Research Paper | ScholarLens