Changing trends in a decade of vascular radiology—the impact of technical developments of non-invasive techniques on vascular imaging
Gordon W. Cowell, Allan W. Reid, Giles Roditi
Abstract
Open-access reader
Gordon W. Cowell, Allan W. Reid, Giles Roditi
Abstract
Open-access reader
OBJECTIVES: This review aims to establish the impact on conventional angiography and endovascular intervention of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CE-CTA) on a background of evolving technology, changing clinical requirements and resulting clinical repercussions. METHODS: The angiographic and interventional caseload was prospectively recorded between 1997 and 2010, along with the CE-MRA and CE-CTA caseload. Waiting times and the marginal cost analyses for 2001 and 2009 were also prospectively established. RESULTS: Conventional diagnostic angiographies declined from a peak of 847 to 121 per year while endovascular interventions continue in similar numbers. CE-MRA increased from effectively none initially to 620 per year while CE-CTA has currently risen to 396 per year. Total diagnostic study numbers have increased but at reduced cost. Various influences are clear, including on-site modality availability, capability and accuracy along with impact of new therapies, research studies and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular imaging has undergone a metamorphosis in little over a decade because of CE-MRA and CE-CTA. With waiting times significantly reduced since the start of the study and the cost-effectiveness of both CE-MRA and CE-CTA as primary diagnostic investigations established, further development of these services is inevitable. MAIN MESSAGES: • The availability of CE-MRA and CE-CTA has reduced the need for conventional angiography. • Both waiting times and the marginal cost analyses for CE-MRA and CE-CTA have reduced. • The impact of new therapies, research studies (e.g. ASTRAL) and adverse events is illustrated.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVES: This review aims to establish the impact on conventional angiography and endovascular intervention of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CE-CTA) on a background of evolving technology, changing clinical requirements and resulting clinical repercussions. METHODS: The angiographic and interventional caseload was prospectively recorded between 1997 and 2010, along with the CE-MRA and CE-CTA caseload. Waiting times and the marginal cost analyses for 2001 and 2009 were also prospectively established. RESULTS: Conventional diagnostic angiographies declined from a peak of 847 to 121 per year while endovascular interventions continue in similar numbers. CE-MRA increased from effectively none initially to 620 per year while CE-CTA has currently risen to 396 per year. Total diagnostic study numbers have increased but at reduced cost. Various influences are clear, including on-site modality availability, capability and accuracy along with impact of new therapies, research studies and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular imaging has undergone a metamorphosis in little over a decade because of CE-MRA and CE-CTA. With waiting times significantly reduced since the start of the study and the cost-effectiveness of both CE-MRA and CE-CTA as primary diagnostic investigations established, further development of these services is inevitable. MAIN MESSAGES: • The availability of CE-MRA and CE-CTA has reduced the need for conventional angiography. • Both waiting times and the marginal cost analyses for CE-MRA and CE-CTA have reduced. • The impact of new therapies, research studies (e.g. ASTRAL) and adverse events is illustrated.
Key concepts: Medicine, Neuroradiology, Interventional radiology, Radiology, Angiography, Magnetic resonance angiography, Adverse effect, Magnetic resonance imaging