1991South African Journal of Plant and SoilOpen access

The effect of various tillage methods on soil and water losses from maize lands

Walter B. Russell

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Natural runoff plots on which maize was produced were laid out at Cedara on a well-drained clay loam Doveton soil and showed, over a six-year period, the benefits to be gained from adopting conservation tillage practices. The four tillage and crop utilization practices compared were: no-till with all crop residues retained; chisel ploughing after simulated light grazing (which left half of the crop residues on the surface); mouldboard ploughing in spring after simulated light grazing; and mouldboard ploughing in autumn after the removal of all plant residues. Mean annual soil loss and runoff (in parentheses) for the respective tillage practices were 0.41 (18 mm); 1.11 (25 mm); 3.01 (38 mm) and 5.91 (66 mm).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Natural runoff plots on which maize was produced were laid out at Cedara on a well-drained clay loam Doveton soil and showed, over a six-year period, the benefits to be gained from adopting conservation tillage practices. The four tillage and crop utilization practices compared were: no-till with all crop residues retained; chisel ploughing after simulated light grazing (which left half of the crop residues on the surface); mouldboard ploughing in spring after simulated light grazing; and mouldboard ploughing in autumn after the removal of all plant residues. Mean annual soil loss and runoff (in parentheses) for the respective tillage practices were 0.41 (18 mm); 1.11 (25 mm); 3.01 (38 mm) and 5.91 (66 mm).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Natural runoff plots on which maize was produced were laid out at Cedara on a well-drained clay loam Doveton soil and showed, over a six-year period, the benefits to be gained from adopting conservation tillage practices. The four tillage and crop utilization practices compared were: no-till with all crop residues retained; chisel ploughing after simulated light grazing (which left half of the crop residues on the surface); mouldboard ploughing in spring after simulated light grazing; and mouldboard ploughing in autumn after the removal of all plant residues. Mean annual soil loss and runoff (in parentheses) for the respective tillage practices were 0.41 (18 mm); 1.11 (25 mm); 3.01 (38 mm) and 5.91 (66 mm).

Key concepts: Plough, Chisel, Tillage, Loam, Surface runoff, Agronomy, Mulch-till, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effect of various tillage methods on soil and water losses from maize lands — Research Paper | ScholarLens