Models for Pleistocene Extinction
Kit W. Wesler
Abstract
Kit W. Wesler
Abstract
Arguments for Paleoindian overkill of Late Pleistocene megafauna have traditionally emphasized North America with little more than token reference to other areas. Other scholars reject human causation of Pleistocene extinctions, preferring to see in climatic and environmental changes a sufficient explanation for the losses of these forms. This paper discusses the idea of overkill with reference to a computer simulation by Mosimann and Martin (1975), and offers reasons for preferring an alternative formulation. It is also suggested that the case of South America should be reviewed separately, and that an environmental explanation of Pleistocene extinction may be more suitable there.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Arguments for Paleoindian overkill of Late Pleistocene megafauna have traditionally emphasized North America with little more than token reference to other areas. Other scholars reject human causation of Pleistocene extinctions, preferring to see in climatic and environmental changes a sufficient explanation for the losses of these forms. This paper discusses the idea of overkill with reference to a computer simulation by Mosimann and Martin (1975), and offers reasons for preferring an alternative formulation. It is also suggested that the case of South America should be reviewed separately, and that an environmental explanation of Pleistocene extinction may be more suitable there.
Key concepts: Megafauna, Pleistocene, Extinction (optical mineralogy), Causation, Archaeology, Geography, Paleontology, Ecology