1988Journal of Clinical GastroenterologyRequires access

Intraesophageal pH Monitoring after Breakfast + Lunch in Gastroesophageal Reflux

L Grande, Amadeo Pujol, Emilio Peña Ros, Juan Carlos García‐Valdecasas, José Fuster, José Visa, Cristóbal Pera

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

To evaluate intraesophageal pH monitoring during two consecutive 3-h postprandial periods (breakfast + lunch) in the diagnosis of pathological gastroesophageal reflux, we studied 40 patients with documented gastroesophageal reflux and 15 healthy controls. Reflux events were analyzed in the two separate postprandial periods, their sum (double postprandial pHmetry), and a standard 24-h period. Data from all pH-recording periods were compared and correlation coefficients were obtained between postprandial and 24-h reflux events. While pH recordings from the two separate postprandial periods provided good separation between patients and controls, double postprandial pHmetry was most accurate in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. In the latter procedure, mean percent reflux time was 2.5 +/- 1.8% in controls and 19.4% +/- 10.3% in patients (p less than 0.001), with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 97%. A high degree of correlation existed for all reflux events between postprandial and 24-h pHmetries. We believe that double postprandial intraesophageal pH monitoring accurately distinguishes between normal persons and patients with pathological reflux. The technique considerably shortens the examination time in relation to 24-h pH monitoring and may prove the esophageal test of choice for objective evidence of gastroesophageal reflux.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To evaluate intraesophageal pH monitoring during two consecutive 3-h postprandial periods (breakfast + lunch) in the diagnosis of pathological gastroesophageal reflux, we studied 40 patients with documented gastroesophageal reflux and 15 healthy controls. Reflux events were analyzed in the two separate postprandial periods, their sum (double postprandial pHmetry), and a standard 24-h period. Data from all pH-recording periods were compared and correlation coefficients were obtained between postprandial and 24-h reflux events. While pH recordings from the two separate postprandial periods provided good separation between patients and controls, double postprandial pHmetry was most accurate in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. In the latter procedure, mean percent reflux time was 2.5 +/- 1.8% in controls and 19.4% +/- 10.3% in patients (p less than 0.001), with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 97%. A high degree of correlation existed for all reflux events between postprandial and 24-h pHmetries. We believe that double postprandial intraesophageal pH monitoring accurately distinguishes between normal persons and patients with pathological reflux. The technique considerably shortens the examination time in relation to 24-h pH monitoring and may prove the esophageal test of choice for objective evidence of gastroesophageal reflux.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To evaluate intraesophageal pH monitoring during two consecutive 3-h postprandial periods (breakfast + lunch) in the diagnosis of pathological gastroesophageal reflux, we studied 40 patients with documented gastroesophageal reflux and 15 healthy controls. Reflux events were analyzed in the two separate postprandial periods, their sum (double postprandial pHmetry), and a standard 24-h period. Data from all pH-recording periods were compared and correlation coefficients were obtained between postprandial and 24-h reflux events. While pH recordings from the two separate postprandial periods provided good separation between patients and controls, double postprandial pHmetry was most accurate in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. In the latter procedure, mean percent reflux time was 2.5 +/- 1.8% in controls and 19.4% +/- 10.3% in patients (p less than 0.001), with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 97%. A high degree of correlation existed for all reflux events between postprandial and 24-h pHmetries. We believe that double postprandial intraesophageal pH monitoring accurately distinguishes between normal persons and patients with pathological reflux. The technique considerably shortens the examination time in relation to 24-h pH monitoring and may prove the esophageal test of choice for objective evidence of gastroesophageal reflux.

Key concepts: Postprandial, Reflux, Medicine, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Esophageal pH monitoring, Pathological, GERD

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intraesophageal pH Monitoring after Breakfast + Lunch in Gastroesophageal Reflux — Research Paper | ScholarLens