The Activity of Individual Trunk Muscles During Heavy Physical Loading
Carl Zetterberg, Gunnar Andersson, Albert B. Schultz
Abstract
Carl Zetterberg, Gunnar Andersson, Albert B. Schultz
Abstract
The myoelectric activity of ten trunk muscles were recorded, using intramuscular electrodes, when ten subjects made maximal and 50% of maximal static exertions in standing postures. Exertions were made in flexion, extension, and left and right lateral bending. Three heavy-lifting tasks also were studied. A biomechanical model was used to predict the forces in the trunk muscles, and the predictions then were compared to the measurements. The abdominal muscles were all active in attempted flexion, while the erector spinae muscles were inactive. In attempted extension, the erectors were maximally active, but considerable activity was present in the abdominal muscles as well. The highest activity levels recorded in the oblique abdominal muscles were in lateral bending. There were high degrees of correlation between the measured muscle activities and predicted muscle tensions for the erector spinae and rectus abdominus muscles, while the correlation coefficients for the oblique abdominal muscles were lower (0.4-0.7). The study indicates that inclusion of antagonistic activity is an important consideration to improve model predictions. The oblique abdominal muscles appear to be more active, in general, than predicted. For the longitudinal trunk muscles, the predictions are excellent throughout.
OpenAlex reports 91 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The myoelectric activity of ten trunk muscles were recorded, using intramuscular electrodes, when ten subjects made maximal and 50% of maximal static exertions in standing postures. Exertions were made in flexion, extension, and left and right lateral bending. Three heavy-lifting tasks also were studied. A biomechanical model was used to predict the forces in the trunk muscles, and the predictions then were compared to the measurements. The abdominal muscles were all active in attempted flexion, while the erector spinae muscles were inactive. In attempted extension, the erectors were maximally active, but considerable activity was present in the abdominal muscles as well. The highest activity levels recorded in the oblique abdominal muscles were in lateral bending. There were high degrees of correlation between the measured muscle activities and predicted muscle tensions for the erector spinae and rectus abdominus muscles, while the correlation coefficients for the oblique abdominal muscles were lower (0.4-0.7). The study indicates that inclusion of antagonistic activity is an important consideration to improve model predictions. The oblique abdominal muscles appear to be more active, in general, than predicted. For the longitudinal trunk muscles, the predictions are excellent throughout.
Key concepts: Medicine, Erector spinae muscles, Trunk, Abdominal muscles, Electromyography, Anatomy, Back muscles, Oblique case