Proactive monitoring for newly emerging evidence: The lost step of EBP?
Drew Keister, Jeffrey L. Tilson
Abstract
Drew Keister, Jeffrey L. Tilson
Abstract
The 5 steps of evidence-based practice (EBP) were described in 1992.1 The steps are: 1. Translation of uncertainty to an answerable question; 2. Systematic retrieval of best evidence available; 3. Critical appraisal of evidence for validity, clinical relevance, and applicability; 4. Application of results in practice; and 5. Evaluation of performance. According to the Sicily Statement on Evidence-based Practice,2 the steps describe a codified set of behaviours that form the basis for evidence-based clinical practice. The steps have also been the primary focus of teaching efforts in EBP. As …
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The 5 steps of evidence-based practice (EBP) were described in 1992.1 The steps are: 1. Translation of uncertainty to an answerable question; 2. Systematic retrieval of best evidence available; 3. Critical appraisal of evidence for validity, clinical relevance, and applicability; 4. Application of results in practice; and 5. Evaluation of performance. According to the Sicily Statement on Evidence-based Practice,2 the steps describe a codified set of behaviours that form the basis for evidence-based clinical practice. The steps have also been the primary focus of teaching efforts in EBP. As …
Key concepts: Evidence-based practice, Relevance (law), Statement (logic), Critical appraisal, Set (abstract data type), Focus (optics), Psychology, Evidence-based medicine