Clinical Role of Non-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Evaluation of Renal Artery Stenosis
Daisuke Utsunomiya, Mitsue Miyazaki, Yohei Nomitsu, Yosuke Komeda, Takashi Okigawa, Joji Urata, Yasuyuki Yamashita
Abstract
Open-access reader
Daisuke Utsunomiya, Mitsue Miyazaki, Yohei Nomitsu, Yosuke Komeda, Takashi Okigawa, Joji Urata, Yasuyuki Yamashita
Abstract
Open-access reader
BACKGROUND: The association between a gadolinium-based contrast material and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis has been discussed. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) might provide sufficient information of renal artery stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: The non-contrast MRA of 26 patients with hypertension was retrospectively reviewed in the present study. The significant renal artery stenosis was visually evaluated by comparing non-contrast MRA with computed tomography or conventional angiographic finding. Difference of the intensities between the proximal and distal aorta was quantitatively evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of non-contrast MRA in the evaluation of the renal artery stenosis was 78%, 91%, 64% and 96%, respectively. The distal abdominal aorta showed less signal intensity than the proximal aorta by 16.9+/-12.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Non-contrast MRA is a non-invasive and effective method that allows evaluation of the renal artery stenosis.
OpenAlex reports 54 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: The association between a gadolinium-based contrast material and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis has been discussed. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) might provide sufficient information of renal artery stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: The non-contrast MRA of 26 patients with hypertension was retrospectively reviewed in the present study. The significant renal artery stenosis was visually evaluated by comparing non-contrast MRA with computed tomography or conventional angiographic finding. Difference of the intensities between the proximal and distal aorta was quantitatively evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of non-contrast MRA in the evaluation of the renal artery stenosis was 78%, 91%, 64% and 96%, respectively. The distal abdominal aorta showed less signal intensity than the proximal aorta by 16.9+/-12.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Non-contrast MRA is a non-invasive and effective method that allows evaluation of the renal artery stenosis.
Key concepts: Medicine, Renal artery stenosis, Magnetic resonance angiography, Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, Stenosis, Radiology, Renal artery, Abdominal aorta