2014Acta OphthalmologicaRequires access

Scleral Lenses in the United States

Deborah S. Jacobs

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract There is growing acceptance of scleral lenses by ophthalmologists, optometrists, and patients in the United States. Options among mini‐scleral and scleral lenses will be reviewed. PROSE treatment (prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem) as a therapeutic approach will be introduced. Success rate for PROSE treatment among patients with ectasia/astigmatism and in patients with ocular surface disease will be presented, as will experience with PROSE treatment in pediatric patients. Evidence for reversal of corneal scarring with PROSE treatment of ocular surface disease will be presented. Scleral lens and PROSE treatment are important alternatives to keratoplasty for corneal scarring and to tarsorrhaphy for exposure. Clinicians and researchers should be aware of scleral lens and PROSE treatment as important options for patients with ocular surface disease or contact lens intolerance, who may be at at higher risk of complications, contact lens dependence, or graft failure with penetrating keratoplasty.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract There is growing acceptance of scleral lenses by ophthalmologists, optometrists, and patients in the United States. Options among mini‐scleral and scleral lenses will be reviewed. PROSE treatment (prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem) as a therapeutic approach will be introduced. Success rate for PROSE treatment among patients with ectasia/astigmatism and in patients with ocular surface disease will be presented, as will experience with PROSE treatment in pediatric patients. Evidence for reversal of corneal scarring with PROSE treatment of ocular surface disease will be presented. Scleral lens and PROSE treatment are important alternatives to keratoplasty for corneal scarring and to tarsorrhaphy for exposure. Clinicians and researchers should be aware of scleral lens and PROSE treatment as important options for patients with ocular surface disease or contact lens intolerance, who may be at at higher risk of complications, contact lens dependence, or graft failure with penetrating keratoplasty.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract There is growing acceptance of scleral lenses by ophthalmologists, optometrists, and patients in the United States. Options among mini‐scleral and scleral lenses will be reviewed. PROSE treatment (prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem) as a therapeutic approach will be introduced. Success rate for PROSE treatment among patients with ectasia/astigmatism and in patients with ocular surface disease will be presented, as will experience with PROSE treatment in pediatric patients. Evidence for reversal of corneal scarring with PROSE treatment of ocular surface disease will be presented. Scleral lens and PROSE treatment are important alternatives to keratoplasty for corneal scarring and to tarsorrhaphy for exposure. Clinicians and researchers should be aware of scleral lens and PROSE treatment as important options for patients with ocular surface disease or contact lens intolerance, who may be at at higher risk of complications, contact lens dependence, or graft failure with penetrating keratoplasty.

Key concepts: Scleral lens, Medicine, Corneal disease, Ophthalmology, Contact lens, Optometry, Corneal Transplant, Astigmatism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Scleral Lenses in the United States — Research Paper | ScholarLens