1998Entomologia Experimentalis et ApplicataRequires access

Differential ovicidal and larvicidal resistance to benzoylureas in the codling moth, Cydia pomonella

Benôit Sauphanor, Veronique Brosse, Catherine Monier, Jean Bouvier

Open publisher page 45 citations

Abstract

Abstract French populations of the codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae), a major pest in apple and pear orchards, have developed resistance to different classes of insecticides including the benzoylurea diflubenzuron, a chitin synthesis inhibitor. Ovicidal tests performed on two susceptible strains and one strain selected for its resistance to diflubenzuron revealed the same order of magnitude in resistance ratios to this compound (30‐fold) and two other benzoylureas teflubenzuron and flufenoxuron (22‐ and 11‐fold, respectively). Field rates of these three compounds induced a 45–55% decrease in hatching in the resistant strain, compared to over 90% in the susceptible insects. Despite a 52‐fold ovicidal resistance ratio to the juvenile hormone analog fenoxycarb, this compound induced a 85% decrease in hatching in the resistant strain. Conversely the newly hatched larvae of the resistant strain exhibited a 45 000‐, 33‐ and 2.1‐fold resistance ratio to diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron and flufenoxuron, respectively. The latter value was not significant, and the field rate of flufenoxuron killed over 97% of the resistant larvae while diflubenzuron had no effect. This lack of relationship between ovicidal and larvicidal resistance may be due to different transport properties together with differential enzymatic metabolization. Our results may limit the validity of substitution instars, which approach is frequently used for resistance monitoring. More importantly for resistance management, the resistance of different target instars to each compound has to be considered when establishing control strategies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract French populations of the codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae), a major pest in apple and pear orchards, have developed resistance to different classes of insecticides including the benzoylurea diflubenzuron, a chitin synthesis inhibitor. Ovicidal tests performed on two susceptible strains and one strain selected for its resistance to diflubenzuron revealed the same order of magnitude in resistance ratios to this compound (30‐fold) and two other benzoylureas teflubenzuron and flufenoxuron (22‐ and 11‐fold, respectively). Field rates of these three compounds induced a 45–55% decrease in hatching in the resistant strain, compared to over 90% in the susceptible insects. Despite a 52‐fold ovicidal resistance ratio to the juvenile hormone analog fenoxycarb, this compound induced a 85% decrease in hatching in the resistant strain. Conversely the newly hatched larvae of the resistant strain exhibited a 45 000‐, 33‐ and 2.1‐fold resistance ratio to diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron and flufenoxuron, respectively. The latter value was not significant, and the field rate of flufenoxuron killed over 97% of the resistant larvae while diflubenzuron had no effect. This lack of relationship between ovicidal and larvicidal resistance may be due to different transport properties together with differential enzymatic metabolization. Our results may limit the validity of substitution instars, which approach is frequently used for resistance monitoring. More importantly for resistance management, the resistance of different target instars to each compound has to be considered when establishing control strategies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract French populations of the codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae), a major pest in apple and pear orchards, have developed resistance to different classes of insecticides including the benzoylurea diflubenzuron, a chitin synthesis inhibitor. Ovicidal tests performed on two susceptible strains and one strain selected for its resistance to diflubenzuron revealed the same order of magnitude in resistance ratios to this compound (30‐fold) and two other benzoylureas teflubenzuron and flufenoxuron (22‐ and 11‐fold, respectively). Field rates of these three compounds induced a 45–55% decrease in hatching in the resistant strain, compared to over 90% in the susceptible insects. Despite a 52‐fold ovicidal resistance ratio to the juvenile hormone analog fenoxycarb, this compound induced a 85% decrease in hatching in the resistant strain. Conversely the newly hatched larvae of the resistant strain exhibited a 45 000‐, 33‐ and 2.1‐fold resistance ratio to diflubenzuron, teflubenzuron and flufenoxuron, respectively. The latter value was not significant, and the field rate of flufenoxuron killed over 97% of the resistant larvae while diflubenzuron had no effect. This lack of relationship between ovicidal and larvicidal resistance may be due to different transport properties together with differential enzymatic metabolization. Our results may limit the validity of substitution instars, which approach is frequently used for resistance monitoring. More importantly for resistance management, the resistance of different target instars to each compound has to be considered when establishing control strategies.

Key concepts: Diflubenzuron, Codling moth, Tortricidae, Biology, Insect growth regulator, Lepidoptera genitalia, Pyriproxyfen, Hatching

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Differential ovicidal and larvicidal resistance to benzoylureas in the codling moth, Cydia pomonella — Research Paper | ScholarLens