2010Southwestern EntomologistRequires access

Bt Resistance inHelicoverpa zea1(Boddie): from Biology to Monitoring

William J. Moar, Timothy J. Dennehy, Konasale J. Anilkumar, Graham Head

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Results from conventional resistance monitoring and F2 screens have found no evidence of major resistance alleles to Cry1Ac in the bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), in US cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., fields. Furthermore, sentinel field plot results show no changes in field performance of Cry1Ac cotton despite 14 years of commercial use. Although insecticide-resistant management practices such as refugia, insecticide oversprays, and pyramided traits in Bt cotton have likely contributed to the lack of observed resistance development and changes in field efficacy, fitness costs associated with the development of Cry1Ac resistance in bollworm probably also have contributed to this outcome. This paper discusses various fitness costs associated with Cry1Ac resistance in bollworm and concludes with a discussion of how exclusive use of diet-based laboratory bioassays may underestimate their role in delaying development of resistance to Bt.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Results from conventional resistance monitoring and F2 screens have found no evidence of major resistance alleles to Cry1Ac in the bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), in US cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., fields. Furthermore, sentinel field plot results show no changes in field performance of Cry1Ac cotton despite 14 years of commercial use. Although insecticide-resistant management practices such as refugia, insecticide oversprays, and pyramided traits in Bt cotton have likely contributed to the lack of observed resistance development and changes in field efficacy, fitness costs associated with the development of Cry1Ac resistance in bollworm probably also have contributed to this outcome. This paper discusses various fitness costs associated with Cry1Ac resistance in bollworm and concludes with a discussion of how exclusive use of diet-based laboratory bioassays may underestimate their role in delaying development of resistance to Bt.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Results from conventional resistance monitoring and F2 screens have found no evidence of major resistance alleles to Cry1Ac in the bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), in US cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., fields. Furthermore, sentinel field plot results show no changes in field performance of Cry1Ac cotton despite 14 years of commercial use. Although insecticide-resistant management practices such as refugia, insecticide oversprays, and pyramided traits in Bt cotton have likely contributed to the lack of observed resistance development and changes in field efficacy, fitness costs associated with the development of Cry1Ac resistance in bollworm probably also have contributed to this outcome. This paper discusses various fitness costs associated with Cry1Ac resistance in bollworm and concludes with a discussion of how exclusive use of diet-based laboratory bioassays may underestimate their role in delaying development of resistance to Bt.

Key concepts: Cry1Ac, Helicoverpa zea, Biology, Bollworm, Resistance (ecology), Agronomy, Bt cotton, Insecticide resistance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bt Resistance inHelicoverpa zea1(Boddie): from Biology to Monitoring — Research Paper | ScholarLens