2006Sport in SocietyRequires access

Physical Education and Figurational Sociology: An Appreciation of the Work of Eric Dunning

Ken Green

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

Ironically, given that the sociological study of sport has its roots in academic physical education, Dunning has very little to say explicitly about the subject. Nevertheless, his work is significant for physical education in at least two ways. Firstly, at a general level, it draws our attention to the need for a more properly sociological perspective on an area – physical education and sport in schools generally – which is shot through with ideology and pseudo-sociology. Secondly, Dunning's commentaries on sport have particular resonance for a subject which many still refer to as ‘sport in schools’. This essay explores these two themes by commenting upon the ways in which I have found the work of Eric Dunning, and Eliasian sociology in general, to be of direct relevance to the sociology of physical education.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ironically, given that the sociological study of sport has its roots in academic physical education, Dunning has very little to say explicitly about the subject. Nevertheless, his work is significant for physical education in at least two ways. Firstly, at a general level, it draws our attention to the need for a more properly sociological perspective on an area – physical education and sport in schools generally – which is shot through with ideology and pseudo-sociology. Secondly, Dunning's commentaries on sport have particular resonance for a subject which many still refer to as ‘sport in schools’. This essay explores these two themes by commenting upon the ways in which I have found the work of Eric Dunning, and Eliasian sociology in general, to be of direct relevance to the sociology of physical education.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ironically, given that the sociological study of sport has its roots in academic physical education, Dunning has very little to say explicitly about the subject. Nevertheless, his work is significant for physical education in at least two ways. Firstly, at a general level, it draws our attention to the need for a more properly sociological perspective on an area – physical education and sport in schools generally – which is shot through with ideology and pseudo-sociology. Secondly, Dunning's commentaries on sport have particular resonance for a subject which many still refer to as ‘sport in schools’. This essay explores these two themes by commenting upon the ways in which I have found the work of Eric Dunning, and Eliasian sociology in general, to be of direct relevance to the sociology of physical education.

Key concepts: Sociology, Sociology of sport, Physical education, Ideology, Subject (documents), Relevance (law), Epistemology, Perspective (graphical)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Physical Education and Figurational Sociology: An Appreciation of the Work of Eric Dunning — Research Paper | ScholarLens