Comparing Public and Private Schools: The Puzzling Role of Selectivity Bias
Richard J. Murnane, Stuart Newstead, Randall J. Olsen
Abstract
Richard J. Murnane, Stuart Newstead, Randall J. Olsen
Abstract
Recent articles using the same data and variants of the same estimation technique report conflicting estimates of the relative quality of education provided by public and Catholic schools. This article explains the reasons for the conflict. In so doing, the article clarifies the assumptions underlying the increasingly popular two-step methods for controlling selectivity bias and highlights the hazards of using these methods when the assumptions are not satisfied. The article also illustrates an alternative method for detecting the presence of selectivity bias.
OpenAlex reports 100 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Recent articles using the same data and variants of the same estimation technique report conflicting estimates of the relative quality of education provided by public and Catholic schools. This article explains the reasons for the conflict. In so doing, the article clarifies the assumptions underlying the increasingly popular two-step methods for controlling selectivity bias and highlights the hazards of using these methods when the assumptions are not satisfied. The article also illustrates an alternative method for detecting the presence of selectivity bias.
Key concepts: Econometrics, Estimation, Quality (philosophy), Economics, Computer science, Epistemology, Management, Philosophy