1997Current Opinion in CardiologyRequires access

Update on digoxin and other oral positive inotropic agents for chronic heart failure

Srinivas Reddy, Daniel Benatar, Mihai Gheorghiade

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

The benefit of digoxin in chronic heart failure has been debated fervently for decades. In the 1970s, the use of digoxin was challenged due to the high incidences of digitalis toxicity and the lack of data on the effects of digoxin in patients with chronic heart failure. In the 1980s, interest in digoxin was renewed after several trials with oral inotropic agents demonstrated increased mortality. Recently, several trials have studied the hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and clinical effects of digoxin, providing further insights into the possible mechanisms for its beneficial effects in patients with chronic heart failure. In an effort to find new pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of this patient population, studies of newer oral inotropic agents such as vesnarinone, pimobendan, and ibopamine have been disappointing. This paper reviews data published or presented in 1995 and 1996 examining the effects of digoxin and other oral inotropic agents in patients with chronic heart failure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The benefit of digoxin in chronic heart failure has been debated fervently for decades. In the 1970s, the use of digoxin was challenged due to the high incidences of digitalis toxicity and the lack of data on the effects of digoxin in patients with chronic heart failure. In the 1980s, interest in digoxin was renewed after several trials with oral inotropic agents demonstrated increased mortality. Recently, several trials have studied the hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and clinical effects of digoxin, providing further insights into the possible mechanisms for its beneficial effects in patients with chronic heart failure. In an effort to find new pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of this patient population, studies of newer oral inotropic agents such as vesnarinone, pimobendan, and ibopamine have been disappointing. This paper reviews data published or presented in 1995 and 1996 examining the effects of digoxin and other oral inotropic agents in patients with chronic heart failure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The benefit of digoxin in chronic heart failure has been debated fervently for decades. In the 1970s, the use of digoxin was challenged due to the high incidences of digitalis toxicity and the lack of data on the effects of digoxin in patients with chronic heart failure. In the 1980s, interest in digoxin was renewed after several trials with oral inotropic agents demonstrated increased mortality. Recently, several trials have studied the hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and clinical effects of digoxin, providing further insights into the possible mechanisms for its beneficial effects in patients with chronic heart failure. In an effort to find new pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of this patient population, studies of newer oral inotropic agents such as vesnarinone, pimobendan, and ibopamine have been disappointing. This paper reviews data published or presented in 1995 and 1996 examining the effects of digoxin and other oral inotropic agents in patients with chronic heart failure.

Key concepts: Medicine, Digoxin, Inotrope, Heart failure, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source