An empirical investigation of the properties of a new goodness-of-fit test
Richard Franke, Toke Jayakchandran
Abstract
Richard Franke, Toke Jayakchandran
Abstract
We investigate the power properties of a new goodness-nf-fit test proposed by rontz (1980). This new test is compared with the (The squared test and the Kolmogoma Smirnov (K-S) test for normality when the samples come from (i) the family of asymmetric stable distributions, (ii) mixtures of normal distributions, and (iii) the Pearson family. The general conclusion is that the new test performs better than the Chi squared and the K-S test when the parent distribution is heavy-tailed. If the hypothesized distribution differs from the true distribution in location only, the new test does not do as well as the other two.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We investigate the power properties of a new goodness-nf-fit test proposed by rontz (1980). This new test is compared with the (The squared test and the Kolmogoma Smirnov (K-S) test for normality when the samples come from (i) the family of asymmetric stable distributions, (ii) mixtures of normal distributions, and (iii) the Pearson family. The general conclusion is that the new test performs better than the Chi squared and the K-S test when the parent distribution is heavy-tailed. If the hypothesized distribution differs from the true distribution in location only, the new test does not do as well as the other two.
Key concepts: Mathematics, Goodness of fit, Normality test, Pearson's chi-squared test, Statistics, Anderson–Darling test, Chi-square test, Normality