1990Acta Psychiatrica ScandinavicaRequires access

Moclobemide versus tranylcypromine in the treatment of depression

Ludovic Rossel, E. Mell

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Moclobemide and tranylcypromine were compared in 2 randomized groups of 20 depressed patients each. Fifteen of the patients on moclobemide and 18 of those on tranylcypromine were diagnosed as suffering from endogenous depression. The dosage was 150-300 mg moclobemide and 15-30 mg tranylcypromine daily. At the end of treatment, improvement on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression was 59.3% in the moclobemide group and 65.5% in the tranylcypromine group. The final overall assessment of efficacy was good or very good for 68% of the patients on moclobemide and for 85% of those on tranylcypromine. The final assessment of tolerance was good or very good for 85% of the moclobemide patients and 100% of the tranylcypromine patients. None of the differences in scores between the groups were statistically significant. This study therefore yielded comparable results for efficacy and tolerance of the 2 drugs in the treatment of depression.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Moclobemide and tranylcypromine were compared in 2 randomized groups of 20 depressed patients each. Fifteen of the patients on moclobemide and 18 of those on tranylcypromine were diagnosed as suffering from endogenous depression. The dosage was 150-300 mg moclobemide and 15-30 mg tranylcypromine daily. At the end of treatment, improvement on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression was 59.3% in the moclobemide group and 65.5% in the tranylcypromine group. The final overall assessment of efficacy was good or very good for 68% of the patients on moclobemide and for 85% of those on tranylcypromine. The final assessment of tolerance was good or very good for 85% of the moclobemide patients and 100% of the tranylcypromine patients. None of the differences in scores between the groups were statistically significant. This study therefore yielded comparable results for efficacy and tolerance of the 2 drugs in the treatment of depression.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Moclobemide and tranylcypromine were compared in 2 randomized groups of 20 depressed patients each. Fifteen of the patients on moclobemide and 18 of those on tranylcypromine were diagnosed as suffering from endogenous depression. The dosage was 150-300 mg moclobemide and 15-30 mg tranylcypromine daily. At the end of treatment, improvement on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression was 59.3% in the moclobemide group and 65.5% in the tranylcypromine group. The final overall assessment of efficacy was good or very good for 68% of the patients on moclobemide and for 85% of those on tranylcypromine. The final assessment of tolerance was good or very good for 85% of the moclobemide patients and 100% of the tranylcypromine patients. None of the differences in scores between the groups were statistically significant. This study therefore yielded comparable results for efficacy and tolerance of the 2 drugs in the treatment of depression.

Key concepts: Moclobemide, Tranylcypromine, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Depression (economics), Medicine, Internal medicine, Anesthesia, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Moclobemide versus tranylcypromine in the treatment of depression — Research Paper | ScholarLens