1998•Japan and the World EconomyOpen access

The anatomy of sovereign debt crises: Lessons from the American state defaults of the 1840s

Richard Sylla, JOHN JOSEPH WALLIS

Open full text 16 citations

Abstract

In theory, sovereign states with taxing powers should not have to default on their debts, but in practice they sometimes do default. In the context of the U.S. state defaults of the 1840s, the paper draws attention to a neglected factor in explanations of sovereign defaults, namely, revenue structure, or the mix of revenue sources used to fund state expenditures. Constraints of revenue structure interacted with political considerations and economic expectations to cause nine states to default on their debts in the early 1840s. We identify two cases of default: developed states that chose to default and less developed states that had little choice but to default.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In theory, sovereign states with taxing powers should not have to default on their debts, but in practice they sometimes do default. In the context of the U.S. state defaults of the 1840s, the paper draws attention to a neglected factor in explanations of sovereign defaults, namely, revenue structure, or the mix of revenue sources used to fund state expenditures. Constraints of revenue structure interacted with political considerations and economic expectations to cause nine states to default on their debts in the early 1840s. We identify two cases of default: developed states that chose to default and less developed states that had little choice but to default.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In theory, sovereign states with taxing powers should not have to default on their debts, but in practice they sometimes do default. In the context of the U.S. state defaults of the 1840s, the paper draws attention to a neglected factor in explanations of sovereign defaults, namely, revenue structure, or the mix of revenue sources used to fund state expenditures. Constraints of revenue structure interacted with political considerations and economic expectations to cause nine states to default on their debts in the early 1840s. We identify two cases of default: developed states that chose to default and less developed states that had little choice but to default.

Key concepts: Default, Debt, Revenue, Economics, Sovereign default, Sovereignty, Context (archaeology), State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The anatomy of sovereign debt crises: Lessons from the American state defaults of the 1840s — Research Paper | ScholarLens