2003SpineRequires access

Morphometric Evaluation of Screw Fixation in Atlas via Posterior Arch and Lateral Mass

Mingsheng Tan, Huimin Wang, Yunting Wang, Guangbo Zhang, Ping Yi, Zirong Li, Wei Hongyu, Feng Yang

Open publisher page 278 citations

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: This study is a result of manual and radiologic measurements of 50 isolated anatomic specimens of C1 and five patients of atlantoaxial instability treated by screw fixation via posterior arch and lateral mass. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of screw placement via posterior arch and lateral mass in atlas. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several types of posterior approaches have been adopted for stabilization and fusion of atlantoaxial complex. Before this study, Gallie in 1939 gave a report on a posterior wiring technique that depended on a structural bone graft. Since then, double-looped wiring with two bone grafts and Halifax clamp technique had been introduced. A transarticular screw fixation technique was introduced by Magerl and Seeman in 1987, and a C1 lateral mass screw fixation technique was described by Harms in 2001. However, the feasibility of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass has not been addressed until now. METHODS: Fifty dry samples of atlas were measured manually and radiologically with vernier calipers, protractors, and CT. The parameters of posterior arch, lateral mass, vertebral artery groove, axis length of screw path via posterior arch and lateral mass, the entry point, and screw direction were measured. Five patients of atlantoaxial instability were treated with this technique and the radiographs and CT scans were evaluated after surgery. RESULTS: The longest trajectory distance of the screw path was about 30 mm. The outer thickness at the thinnest part of groove was 4.58 mm, and it was found to be <4 mm in four cases (8%). The entry point is 18-20 mm lateral to the midline and 2 mm superior to the inferior border of posterior arch. The direction of screw placement is perpendicular to the coronal plane and about 5 degrees cephalad to the transverse plane. Ten screws via posterior arch and lateral mass were placed properly, without incidence of nerve or blood vessel injury in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Atlas is capable for screw fixation via its posterior arch and lateral mass.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

STUDY DESIGN: This study is a result of manual and radiologic measurements of 50 isolated anatomic specimens of C1 and five patients of atlantoaxial instability treated by screw fixation via posterior arch and lateral mass. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of screw placement via posterior arch and lateral mass in atlas. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several types of posterior approaches have been adopted for stabilization and fusion of atlantoaxial complex. Before this study, Gallie in 1939 gave a report on a posterior wiring technique that depended on a structural bone graft. Since then, double-looped wiring with two bone grafts and Halifax clamp technique had been introduced. A transarticular screw fixation technique was introduced by Magerl and Seeman in 1987, and a C1 lateral mass screw fixation technique was described by Harms in 2001. However, the feasibility of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass has not been addressed until now. METHODS: Fifty dry samples of atlas were measured manually and radiologically with vernier calipers, protractors, and CT. The parameters of posterior arch, lateral mass, vertebral artery groove, axis length of screw path via posterior arch and lateral mass, the entry point, and screw direction were measured. Five patients of atlantoaxial instability were treated with this technique and the radiographs and CT scans were evaluated after surgery. RESULTS: The longest trajectory distance of the screw path was about 30 mm. The outer thickness at the thinnest part of groove was 4.58 mm, and it was found to be <4 mm in four cases (8%). The entry point is 18-20 mm lateral to the midline and 2 mm superior to the inferior border of posterior arch. The direction of screw placement is perpendicular to the coronal plane and about 5 degrees cephalad to the transverse plane. Ten screws via posterior arch and lateral mass were placed properly, without incidence of nerve or blood vessel injury in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Atlas is capable for screw fixation via its posterior arch and lateral mass.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 278 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

STUDY DESIGN: This study is a result of manual and radiologic measurements of 50 isolated anatomic specimens of C1 and five patients of atlantoaxial instability treated by screw fixation via posterior arch and lateral mass. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of screw placement via posterior arch and lateral mass in atlas. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several types of posterior approaches have been adopted for stabilization and fusion of atlantoaxial complex. Before this study, Gallie in 1939 gave a report on a posterior wiring technique that depended on a structural bone graft. Since then, double-looped wiring with two bone grafts and Halifax clamp technique had been introduced. A transarticular screw fixation technique was introduced by Magerl and Seeman in 1987, and a C1 lateral mass screw fixation technique was described by Harms in 2001. However, the feasibility of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass has not been addressed until now. METHODS: Fifty dry samples of atlas were measured manually and radiologically with vernier calipers, protractors, and CT. The parameters of posterior arch, lateral mass, vertebral artery groove, axis length of screw path via posterior arch and lateral mass, the entry point, and screw direction were measured. Five patients of atlantoaxial instability were treated with this technique and the radiographs and CT scans were evaluated after surgery. RESULTS: The longest trajectory distance of the screw path was about 30 mm. The outer thickness at the thinnest part of groove was 4.58 mm, and it was found to be <4 mm in four cases (8%). The entry point is 18-20 mm lateral to the midline and 2 mm superior to the inferior border of posterior arch. The direction of screw placement is perpendicular to the coronal plane and about 5 degrees cephalad to the transverse plane. Ten screws via posterior arch and lateral mass were placed properly, without incidence of nerve or blood vessel injury in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Atlas is capable for screw fixation via its posterior arch and lateral mass.

Key concepts: Lateral mass, Atlantoaxial instability, Atlas (anatomy), Medicine, Arch, Calipers, Fixation (population genetics), Vertebral artery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Morphometric Evaluation of Screw Fixation in Atlas via Posterior Arch and Lateral Mass — Research Paper | ScholarLens