2008Internal MedicineOpen access

Lamivudine Treatment Improves the Prognosis of Fulminant Hepatitis B

Yasuhiro Miyake, Yoshiaki Iwasaki, Akinobu Takaki, Shin-ichi Fujioka, Kouichi Takaguchi, Hiroshi Ikeda, Haruhiko Kobashi, Kohsaku Sakaguchi, Yasushi Shiratori

Open full text 57 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of lamivudine for fulminant hepatitis B has been reported in Europe and West Asia. However, in these reports, the main infection genotype is D. Furthermore, if lamivudine improves survival, prognostic factors for fulminant hepatitis B may differ from those reported previously. The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic factors and the efficacy of lamivudine for fulminant hepatitis B in Japan, where the main infection genotype is B. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study. We selected 37 consecutive patients with fulminant hepatitis due to acute hepatitis B virus infection. As 4 of them had received liver transplantation, the data of 33 patients with a median age of 45 (range, 20-74) years were analyzed. RESULTS: Lamivudine was administered to 10 patients. There were no differences in clinical features at the time of the diagnosis of fulminant hepatitis B between patients treated with and without lamivudine. Survival rates of patients treated with and without lamivudine were 70% and 26%, respectively. Age (> or =45 years), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and non-administration of lamivudine were associated with fatal outcomes. The survival rates of patients treated with and without lamivudine, who were in a state of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, were 50% and 9%, and in patients aged > or =45 years, 50% and 8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the efficacy of lamivudine for fulminant hepatitis B in the area where the main infection genotype is B. We consider that lamivudine is worth administering to patients with fulminant hepatitis B.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of lamivudine for fulminant hepatitis B has been reported in Europe and West Asia. However, in these reports, the main infection genotype is D. Furthermore, if lamivudine improves survival, prognostic factors for fulminant hepatitis B may differ from those reported previously. The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic factors and the efficacy of lamivudine for fulminant hepatitis B in Japan, where the main infection genotype is B. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study. We selected 37 consecutive patients with fulminant hepatitis due to acute hepatitis B virus infection. As 4 of them had received liver transplantation, the data of 33 patients with a median age of 45 (range, 20-74) years were analyzed. RESULTS: Lamivudine was administered to 10 patients. There were no differences in clinical features at the time of the diagnosis of fulminant hepatitis B between patients treated with and without lamivudine. Survival rates of patients treated with and without lamivudine were 70% and 26%, respectively. Age (> or =45 years), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and non-administration of lamivudine were associated with fatal outcomes. The survival rates of patients treated with and without lamivudine, who were in a state of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, were 50% and 9%, and in patients aged > or =45 years, 50% and 8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the efficacy of lamivudine for fulminant hepatitis B in the area where the main infection genotype is B. We consider that lamivudine is worth administering to patients with fulminant hepatitis B.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of lamivudine for fulminant hepatitis B has been reported in Europe and West Asia. However, in these reports, the main infection genotype is D. Furthermore, if lamivudine improves survival, prognostic factors for fulminant hepatitis B may differ from those reported previously. The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic factors and the efficacy of lamivudine for fulminant hepatitis B in Japan, where the main infection genotype is B. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study. We selected 37 consecutive patients with fulminant hepatitis due to acute hepatitis B virus infection. As 4 of them had received liver transplantation, the data of 33 patients with a median age of 45 (range, 20-74) years were analyzed. RESULTS: Lamivudine was administered to 10 patients. There were no differences in clinical features at the time of the diagnosis of fulminant hepatitis B between patients treated with and without lamivudine. Survival rates of patients treated with and without lamivudine were 70% and 26%, respectively. Age (> or =45 years), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and non-administration of lamivudine were associated with fatal outcomes. The survival rates of patients treated with and without lamivudine, who were in a state of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, were 50% and 9%, and in patients aged > or =45 years, 50% and 8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study suggests the efficacy of lamivudine for fulminant hepatitis B in the area where the main infection genotype is B. We consider that lamivudine is worth administering to patients with fulminant hepatitis B.

Key concepts: Lamivudine, Fulminant hepatitis, Medicine, Fulminant, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis B

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lamivudine Treatment Improves the Prognosis of Fulminant Hepatitis B — Research Paper | ScholarLens