2012RespirationRequires access

Perception versus Reality: The Measuring of Pleural Fluid pH in the United States

Mark Bowling, Peter Lenz, Arjun Chatterjee, John Conforti, Edward F. Haponik, Robert Chin

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pleural fluid pH measured by a blood gas analyzer is the only recommended method of pH measurement to guide management for patients with parapneumonic pleural effusions. Not all hospitals use blood gas analyzers for pleural fluid pH determination and it is unknown if physicians are aware of this problem. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a discrepancy exists between the modality used for measuring pleural fluid pH and how physicians believe it is measured. METHODS: We surveyed pulmonologists randomly across the USA by e-mail inquiring how they thought pleural fluid pH was measured at their laboratory. We then independently contacted the laboratory and asked how pleural fluid pH was actually measured. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-seven pulmonologists completed the survey. Eighty-six percent of the pulmonologists use pleural fluid pH to manage complicated parapneumonic effusions. Forty-three percent did not recognize blood gas analyzer solely as the most accurate and validated method. Thirty-nine percent of the physicians who use pleural pH to manage effusions and believe that blood gas analyzers are the most accurate were wrong in their assumption that their laboratory was using this tool for pleural pH measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Whether it is due to inaccurate knowledge or a perception of how pleural fluid pH is tested, a significant number of pulmonologists, when treating complicated parapneumonic effusions, may be making management decisions based on erroneous information.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Pleural fluid pH measured by a blood gas analyzer is the only recommended method of pH measurement to guide management for patients with parapneumonic pleural effusions. Not all hospitals use blood gas analyzers for pleural fluid pH determination and it is unknown if physicians are aware of this problem. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a discrepancy exists between the modality used for measuring pleural fluid pH and how physicians believe it is measured. METHODS: We surveyed pulmonologists randomly across the USA by e-mail inquiring how they thought pleural fluid pH was measured at their laboratory. We then independently contacted the laboratory and asked how pleural fluid pH was actually measured. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-seven pulmonologists completed the survey. Eighty-six percent of the pulmonologists use pleural fluid pH to manage complicated parapneumonic effusions. Forty-three percent did not recognize blood gas analyzer solely as the most accurate and validated method. Thirty-nine percent of the physicians who use pleural pH to manage effusions and believe that blood gas analyzers are the most accurate were wrong in their assumption that their laboratory was using this tool for pleural pH measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Whether it is due to inaccurate knowledge or a perception of how pleural fluid pH is tested, a significant number of pulmonologists, when treating complicated parapneumonic effusions, may be making management decisions based on erroneous information.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Pleural fluid pH measured by a blood gas analyzer is the only recommended method of pH measurement to guide management for patients with parapneumonic pleural effusions. Not all hospitals use blood gas analyzers for pleural fluid pH determination and it is unknown if physicians are aware of this problem. OBJECTIVE: To determine if a discrepancy exists between the modality used for measuring pleural fluid pH and how physicians believe it is measured. METHODS: We surveyed pulmonologists randomly across the USA by e-mail inquiring how they thought pleural fluid pH was measured at their laboratory. We then independently contacted the laboratory and asked how pleural fluid pH was actually measured. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-seven pulmonologists completed the survey. Eighty-six percent of the pulmonologists use pleural fluid pH to manage complicated parapneumonic effusions. Forty-three percent did not recognize blood gas analyzer solely as the most accurate and validated method. Thirty-nine percent of the physicians who use pleural pH to manage effusions and believe that blood gas analyzers are the most accurate were wrong in their assumption that their laboratory was using this tool for pleural pH measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Whether it is due to inaccurate knowledge or a perception of how pleural fluid pH is tested, a significant number of pulmonologists, when treating complicated parapneumonic effusions, may be making management decisions based on erroneous information.

Key concepts: Pulmonologists, Medicine, Parapneumonic effusion, Pleural fluid, Pleural disease, Pleural cavity, Internal medicine, Pleural effusion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Perception versus Reality: The Measuring of Pleural Fluid pH in the United States — Research Paper | ScholarLens