Measuring Goodness of Fit for the Double‐Bounded Logit Model
Barbara Kanninen, M. Sami Khawaja
Abstract
Barbara Kanninen, M. Sami Khawaja
Abstract
Abstract The traditional approaches of measuring goodness of fit are shown to be inappropriate in the case of the double‐bounded logit model. An alternate approach called the “sequential classification procedure” is presented as a possible alternative to the standard tests. The double‐bounded logit model is reviewed along with the standard goodness‐of‐fit measures. The sequential classification procedure and its features are presented in the context of an empirical example.
OpenAlex reports 53 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract The traditional approaches of measuring goodness of fit are shown to be inappropriate in the case of the double‐bounded logit model. An alternate approach called the “sequential classification procedure” is presented as a possible alternative to the standard tests. The double‐bounded logit model is reviewed along with the standard goodness‐of‐fit measures. The sequential classification procedure and its features are presented in the context of an empirical example.
Key concepts: Goodness of fit, Logit, Bounded function, Logistic regression, Econometrics, Context (archaeology), Mixed logit, Mathematics