2011Japanese Journal of Applied PhysicsOpen access

Comparison of Interface Characterization between Ag(In,Ga)Se2 and Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells by High-Angle-Annular Dark-Field Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy

Zhang Xianfeng, Tsuyoshi Kobayashi, Yasuyoshi Kurokawa, Yoshiyuki Tashiro, Masahiro Ohtsuka, Tomoyuki Yamada, Akira Yamada

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

The interface of Ag(In,Ga)Se2 (AIGS) and Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) solar cells was investigated by high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) imaging method. It was found from the results that the AIGS film had Ag-rich and Ag-poor layers. The CdS layer in the CIGS solar cell had a denser structure and a better connection with the CIGS layer than the CdS layer in the AIGS solar cell. The lattice between CIGS and CdS was continuous and ordered. However, there were some defects in CdS and the lattice arrangement was distorted at the AIGS/CdS interface in the AIGS solar cell, resulting in the poor performance of the AIGS solar cell compared with the CIGS solar cell.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The interface of Ag(In,Ga)Se2 (AIGS) and Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) solar cells was investigated by high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) imaging method. It was found from the results that the AIGS film had Ag-rich and Ag-poor layers. The CdS layer in the CIGS solar cell had a denser structure and a better connection with the CIGS layer than the CdS layer in the AIGS solar cell. The lattice between CIGS and CdS was continuous and ordered. However, there were some defects in CdS and the lattice arrangement was distorted at the AIGS/CdS interface in the AIGS solar cell, resulting in the poor performance of the AIGS solar cell compared with the CIGS solar cell.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The interface of Ag(In,Ga)Se2 (AIGS) and Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) solar cells was investigated by high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) imaging method. It was found from the results that the AIGS film had Ag-rich and Ag-poor layers. The CdS layer in the CIGS solar cell had a denser structure and a better connection with the CIGS layer than the CdS layer in the AIGS solar cell. The lattice between CIGS and CdS was continuous and ordered. However, there were some defects in CdS and the lattice arrangement was distorted at the AIGS/CdS interface in the AIGS solar cell, resulting in the poor performance of the AIGS solar cell compared with the CIGS solar cell.

Key concepts: Copper indium gallium selenide solar cells, Solar cell, Scanning transmission electron microscopy, Transmission electron microscopy, Materials science, Dark field microscopy, Scanning electron microscope, Optoelectronics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Interface Characterization between Ag(In,Ga)Se2 and Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells by High-Angle-Annular Dark-Field Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy — Research Paper | ScholarLens