1985Polymer TestingOpen access

Electron microscopy methods for studying polymer blends—comparison of scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy

Helén Hassander

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

Abstract The possibility of using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) for studying the morphology of mechanical polymer blends was investigated. Compounds of SBS/EPDM, and both filled and unfilled NBR/EPDM were tested. OsO 4 -stained thin-sections were also examined in a transmission electron microscope (TEM) and the results were compared. It seemed to be quite possible to use atomic number contrast detection in combination with OsO 4 staining for visualizing the morphology of the blends in SEM. Domains as small as 0·1 μm were clearly seen. This was done by means of a Robinson backscattered electron detector. Sample preparation was easy, 2 mm thick rubber plates were cut on dry ice to obtain a smooth surface. After staining, the samples were coated with a thin conductive carbon layer. The inner structures of SBS and the carbon black particles were not resolved in SEM but were easily seen in TEM.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The possibility of using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) for studying the morphology of mechanical polymer blends was investigated. Compounds of SBS/EPDM, and both filled and unfilled NBR/EPDM were tested. OsO 4 -stained thin-sections were also examined in a transmission electron microscope (TEM) and the results were compared. It seemed to be quite possible to use atomic number contrast detection in combination with OsO 4 staining for visualizing the morphology of the blends in SEM. Domains as small as 0·1 μm were clearly seen. This was done by means of a Robinson backscattered electron detector. Sample preparation was easy, 2 mm thick rubber plates were cut on dry ice to obtain a smooth surface. After staining, the samples were coated with a thin conductive carbon layer. The inner structures of SBS and the carbon black particles were not resolved in SEM but were easily seen in TEM.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The possibility of using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) for studying the morphology of mechanical polymer blends was investigated. Compounds of SBS/EPDM, and both filled and unfilled NBR/EPDM were tested. OsO 4 -stained thin-sections were also examined in a transmission electron microscope (TEM) and the results were compared. It seemed to be quite possible to use atomic number contrast detection in combination with OsO 4 staining for visualizing the morphology of the blends in SEM. Domains as small as 0·1 μm were clearly seen. This was done by means of a Robinson backscattered electron detector. Sample preparation was easy, 2 mm thick rubber plates were cut on dry ice to obtain a smooth surface. After staining, the samples were coated with a thin conductive carbon layer. The inner structures of SBS and the carbon black particles were not resolved in SEM but were easily seen in TEM.

Key concepts: Materials science, Polymer characterization, Transmission electron microscopy, Energy filtered transmission electron microscopy, Scanning confocal electron microscopy, Electron microscope, Scanning electron microscope, Conventional transmission electron microscope

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Electron microscopy methods for studying polymer blends—comparison of scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy — Research Paper | ScholarLens