1984JAMARequires access

'Benign' Monoclonal Gammopathy

Robert A. Kyle

Open publisher page 151 citations

Abstract

A series of 241 patients with monoclonal protein but no evidence of multiple myeloma, macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, or lymphoma (benign monoclonal gammopathy) were followed up for more than ten years. The patients were classified as follows: group 1, patients without increase of monoclonal serum protein during follow-up (benign) (37%); group 2, patients with greater than 50% increase of monoclonal protein or development of monoclonal urine protein (5%); group 3, patients who died of unrelated causes (39%); and group 4, patients in whom myeloma, macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, or related diseases developed (19%). The median interval from recognition of the monoclonal protein to diagnosis of multiple myeloma was 98 months; macroglobulinemia, 115 months; and systemic amyloidosis, 92 months. No laboratory or clinical data initially differentiated patients with benign gammopathy from those in whom serious diseases developed. Consequently, serial measurement of serum monoclonal protein is essential.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A series of 241 patients with monoclonal protein but no evidence of multiple myeloma, macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, or lymphoma (benign monoclonal gammopathy) were followed up for more than ten years. The patients were classified as follows: group 1, patients without increase of monoclonal serum protein during follow-up (benign) (37%); group 2, patients with greater than 50% increase of monoclonal protein or development of monoclonal urine protein (5%); group 3, patients who died of unrelated causes (39%); and group 4, patients in whom myeloma, macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, or related diseases developed (19%). The median interval from recognition of the monoclonal protein to diagnosis of multiple myeloma was 98 months; macroglobulinemia, 115 months; and systemic amyloidosis, 92 months. No laboratory or clinical data initially differentiated patients with benign gammopathy from those in whom serious diseases developed. Consequently, serial measurement of serum monoclonal protein is essential.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 151 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A series of 241 patients with monoclonal protein but no evidence of multiple myeloma, macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, or lymphoma (benign monoclonal gammopathy) were followed up for more than ten years. The patients were classified as follows: group 1, patients without increase of monoclonal serum protein during follow-up (benign) (37%); group 2, patients with greater than 50% increase of monoclonal protein or development of monoclonal urine protein (5%); group 3, patients who died of unrelated causes (39%); and group 4, patients in whom myeloma, macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, or related diseases developed (19%). The median interval from recognition of the monoclonal protein to diagnosis of multiple myeloma was 98 months; macroglobulinemia, 115 months; and systemic amyloidosis, 92 months. No laboratory or clinical data initially differentiated patients with benign gammopathy from those in whom serious diseases developed. Consequently, serial measurement of serum monoclonal protein is essential.

Key concepts: Medicine, Monoclonal gammopathy, Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, Paraproteinemias, Monoclonal, Dermatology, Pathology, Monoclonal antibody

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
'Benign' Monoclonal Gammopathy — Research Paper | ScholarLens