2004Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

KNOWLEDGE FLOWS WITHIN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: WHY ARE SOME SUBSIDIARIES ISOLATED?

Luiz Felipe Monteiro, Niklas Arvidsson, Julian Birkinshaw

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

This paper seeks to explain why some subsidiaries are isolated from the knowledge transfer activities within multinational corporations. Applying a new theoretical and empirical approach to intra-firm knowledge transfers, we argue that differences in learning capabilities and in-group-out-group dynamics result in some subsidiaries never or very rarely exchanging any knowledge with other units within the firm. We also propose that sending and receiving knowledge become self-reinforcing cycles, positive for those units that engage but downward spirals for those that are isolated from the knowledge transfers. The roles of both learning capabilities and in-group-out-group categorization were examined with data from 171 subsidiaries around the world belonging to six large Swedish multinationals. Results highlight that subsidiaries with strong learning capabilities are more likely to send knowledge to the rest of the organization. We also found empirical support that units more likely to receive knowledge are those similar, in terms of certain characteristics, to the unit sending the knowledge. Performance implications are discussed and results indicate the existence of a

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper seeks to explain why some subsidiaries are isolated from the knowledge transfer activities within multinational corporations. Applying a new theoretical and empirical approach to intra-firm knowledge transfers, we argue that differences in learning capabilities and in-group-out-group dynamics result in some subsidiaries never or very rarely exchanging any knowledge with other units within the firm. We also propose that sending and receiving knowledge become self-reinforcing cycles, positive for those units that engage but downward spirals for those that are isolated from the knowledge transfers. The roles of both learning capabilities and in-group-out-group categorization were examined with data from 171 subsidiaries around the world belonging to six large Swedish multinationals. Results highlight that subsidiaries with strong learning capabilities are more likely to send knowledge to the rest of the organization. We also found empirical support that units more likely to receive knowledge are those similar, in terms of certain characteristics, to the unit sending the knowledge. Performance implications are discussed and results indicate the existence of a

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper seeks to explain why some subsidiaries are isolated from the knowledge transfer activities within multinational corporations. Applying a new theoretical and empirical approach to intra-firm knowledge transfers, we argue that differences in learning capabilities and in-group-out-group dynamics result in some subsidiaries never or very rarely exchanging any knowledge with other units within the firm. We also propose that sending and receiving knowledge become self-reinforcing cycles, positive for those units that engage but downward spirals for those that are isolated from the knowledge transfers. The roles of both learning capabilities and in-group-out-group categorization were examined with data from 171 subsidiaries around the world belonging to six large Swedish multinationals. Results highlight that subsidiaries with strong learning capabilities are more likely to send knowledge to the rest of the organization. We also found empirical support that units more likely to receive knowledge are those similar, in terms of certain characteristics, to the unit sending the knowledge. Performance implications are discussed and results indicate the existence of a

Key concepts: Subsidiary, Multinational corporation, Business, Knowledge transfer, Categorization, Knowledge management, Corporate group, Unit (ring theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
KNOWLEDGE FLOWS WITHIN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: WHY ARE SOME SUBSIDIARIES ISOLATED? — Research Paper | ScholarLens