2008Forum for Development StudiesRequires access

Cash Transfers Contributing to Social Protection: A Review of Evaluation Findings

Espen Villanger

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The positive effects of conditional cash transfer programmes (CCTs) in Latin America have led to the recommendation that CCTs should be promoted. This may be premature since there is not much knowledge about the critical factors that have led to the positive results. Areas suffering from humanitarian crises, insufficient food supply and poor connection to the nearby markets should not be considered for cash transfer programmes. Several policy implications are identified: (1) The implications of conditionality should be carefully assessed before embarking on these types of programmes as they tend to exclude the most vulnerable groups. (2) One will usually get more poverty reduction for the budget by using broad targeting. (3) Gender equality should be a part of the overall design. (4) Rigorous impact evaluations of universal cash transfer programmes may be important for their future popularity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The positive effects of conditional cash transfer programmes (CCTs) in Latin America have led to the recommendation that CCTs should be promoted. This may be premature since there is not much knowledge about the critical factors that have led to the positive results. Areas suffering from humanitarian crises, insufficient food supply and poor connection to the nearby markets should not be considered for cash transfer programmes. Several policy implications are identified: (1) The implications of conditionality should be carefully assessed before embarking on these types of programmes as they tend to exclude the most vulnerable groups. (2) One will usually get more poverty reduction for the budget by using broad targeting. (3) Gender equality should be a part of the overall design. (4) Rigorous impact evaluations of universal cash transfer programmes may be important for their future popularity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The positive effects of conditional cash transfer programmes (CCTs) in Latin America have led to the recommendation that CCTs should be promoted. This may be premature since there is not much knowledge about the critical factors that have led to the positive results. Areas suffering from humanitarian crises, insufficient food supply and poor connection to the nearby markets should not be considered for cash transfer programmes. Several policy implications are identified: (1) The implications of conditionality should be carefully assessed before embarking on these types of programmes as they tend to exclude the most vulnerable groups. (2) One will usually get more poverty reduction for the budget by using broad targeting. (3) Gender equality should be a part of the overall design. (4) Rigorous impact evaluations of universal cash transfer programmes may be important for their future popularity.

Key concepts: Conditionality, Cash transfers, Social protection, Conditional cash transfer, Popularity, Poverty, Latin Americans, Cash

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cash Transfers Contributing to Social Protection: A Review of Evaluation Findings — Research Paper | ScholarLens