Analysis of a revenue-sharing contract in supply chain management
Zhirui Qin, Jian Yang
Abstract
Zhirui Qin, Jian Yang
Abstract
We consider a supply chain involving one supplier and one retailer in which a revenue-sharing contract is adopted. Under this contract, the retailer can obtain the product from the supplier at a discounted price. As a compensation, the retailer must share his revenue with the supplier at a certain revenue-sharing rate, say r (0≤r≤1), where r represents the portion of the revenue to be kept by the retailer. Our ultimate objective is to help the whole supply chain be more profitable while upholding the individual components' incentives. We use a two-stage (Stackelberg) game to model the problem, where one player is the game's leader and the other the game's follower. Our analysis reveals that for the supply chain to be more profitable, the party that keeps more than half the revenue should serve as the leader of the Stackelberg game.
OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We consider a supply chain involving one supplier and one retailer in which a revenue-sharing contract is adopted. Under this contract, the retailer can obtain the product from the supplier at a discounted price. As a compensation, the retailer must share his revenue with the supplier at a certain revenue-sharing rate, say r (0≤r≤1), where r represents the portion of the revenue to be kept by the retailer. Our ultimate objective is to help the whole supply chain be more profitable while upholding the individual components' incentives. We use a two-stage (Stackelberg) game to model the problem, where one player is the game's leader and the other the game's follower. Our analysis reveals that for the supply chain to be more profitable, the party that keeps more than half the revenue should serve as the leader of the Stackelberg game.
Key concepts: Stackelberg competition, Revenue sharing, Supply chain, Revenue, Business, Microeconomics, Incentive, Revenue management