Childhood Welfare Receipt and the Implications of Welfare Reform
Patricia K. Smith, Wei‐Jun Jean Yeung
Abstract
Patricia K. Smith, Wei‐Jun Jean Yeung
Abstract
The 1996 welfare legislation has generated significant debate about the likely consequences of welfare reform for children in disadvantaged families. We document patterns of childhood welfare receipt for children born between 1967 and 1975 and predict the level and composition of children likely to be affected by the new welfare law. We find that 40 percent of children who received Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) did so for more than 5 years. Nearly all of them lived in families that relied on AFDC for more than half of their income for some years. The data also show an increase in the proportion of preschool children and Caucasians receiving welfare since 1967.
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The 1996 welfare legislation has generated significant debate about the likely consequences of welfare reform for children in disadvantaged families. We document patterns of childhood welfare receipt for children born between 1967 and 1975 and predict the level and composition of children likely to be affected by the new welfare law. We find that 40 percent of children who received Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) did so for more than 5 years. Nearly all of them lived in families that relied on AFDC for more than half of their income for some years. The data also show an increase in the proportion of preschool children and Caucasians receiving welfare since 1967.
Key concepts: Receipt, Welfare, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, Welfare reform, Disadvantaged, Legislation, Demographic economics, Economics