2011Journal of Land Use ScienceOpen access

Soil quality under different land uses in a subarctic environment in Alaska

Mingchu Zhang, Stephen D. Sparrow, Bob Van Veldhuizen, Darleen T. Masiak

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

As the demand for food, feed, fiber, and, most recently, bio-energy increases, more land may be converted from native conditions for arable uses. Our objective was to evaluate soil quality under native forest, arable land being used for continuous barley (Hordeum valgare L.) production and land that had been tilled and subsequently enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) for at least 18 years. Several physical, chemical, and biological soil quality indicators were measured and a soil deterioration index (DI) was calculated using forest soil as the reference. Results indicated that most organic matter under forest resided on soil surface and was not mixed with mineral soil due to lack of activities by large soil fauna (e.g., earthworms). Soil samples from disturbed areas had a higher organic matter content, which caused most soil quality indicators to be considered ‘improved’ and resulted in better DIs for agricultural and CRP land than for forest soils. This study emphasized the importance of choosing an appropriate reference point for soil quality assessments, especially when data representing one or more key soil processes are missing.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As the demand for food, feed, fiber, and, most recently, bio-energy increases, more land may be converted from native conditions for arable uses. Our objective was to evaluate soil quality under native forest, arable land being used for continuous barley (Hordeum valgare L.) production and land that had been tilled and subsequently enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) for at least 18 years. Several physical, chemical, and biological soil quality indicators were measured and a soil deterioration index (DI) was calculated using forest soil as the reference. Results indicated that most organic matter under forest resided on soil surface and was not mixed with mineral soil due to lack of activities by large soil fauna (e.g., earthworms). Soil samples from disturbed areas had a higher organic matter content, which caused most soil quality indicators to be considered ‘improved’ and resulted in better DIs for agricultural and CRP land than for forest soils. This study emphasized the importance of choosing an appropriate reference point for soil quality assessments, especially when data representing one or more key soil processes are missing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As the demand for food, feed, fiber, and, most recently, bio-energy increases, more land may be converted from native conditions for arable uses. Our objective was to evaluate soil quality under native forest, arable land being used for continuous barley (Hordeum valgare L.) production and land that had been tilled and subsequently enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) for at least 18 years. Several physical, chemical, and biological soil quality indicators were measured and a soil deterioration index (DI) was calculated using forest soil as the reference. Results indicated that most organic matter under forest resided on soil surface and was not mixed with mineral soil due to lack of activities by large soil fauna (e.g., earthworms). Soil samples from disturbed areas had a higher organic matter content, which caused most soil quality indicators to be considered ‘improved’ and resulted in better DIs for agricultural and CRP land than for forest soils. This study emphasized the importance of choosing an appropriate reference point for soil quality assessments, especially when data representing one or more key soil processes are missing.

Key concepts: Environmental science, Arable land, Soil biodiversity, Soil quality, Soil organic matter, Soil series, Land use, Agroforestry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Soil quality under different land uses in a subarctic environment in Alaska — Research Paper | ScholarLens