1983•Australasian Journal of DermatologyRequires access

A DOUBLE BLIND TRIAL OF KETOCONAZOLE VERSUS GRISEOFULVIN TREATMENT FOR DERMATOPHYTE INFECTIONS

John Wishart

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Summary Twenty‐seven patients with various dermatophyte infections took part in a double blind study. Thirteen patients were given ketoconazole 200 mg daily and 14 griseofulvin 500 mg daily for up to 60 days. Following ketoconazole therapy, 12 of 13 patients were healed, with minimal lesions in one. In the griseofulvin‐treated group ten of 14 were healed, three having minimal residual lesions and one was a treatment failure. There was a tendency for T. rubrum infections to respond more completely to ketoconazole treatment. At six‐month follow up there was one griseofulvin‐treated failure and one relapse while there were three ketoconazole relapses. It is concluded that both ketoconazole and griseofulvin are effective in treating dermatophyte infections and ketoconazole is a safe alternative to griseofulvin if intolerance or allergy to griseofulvin exists.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary Twenty‐seven patients with various dermatophyte infections took part in a double blind study. Thirteen patients were given ketoconazole 200 mg daily and 14 griseofulvin 500 mg daily for up to 60 days. Following ketoconazole therapy, 12 of 13 patients were healed, with minimal lesions in one. In the griseofulvin‐treated group ten of 14 were healed, three having minimal residual lesions and one was a treatment failure. There was a tendency for T. rubrum infections to respond more completely to ketoconazole treatment. At six‐month follow up there was one griseofulvin‐treated failure and one relapse while there were three ketoconazole relapses. It is concluded that both ketoconazole and griseofulvin are effective in treating dermatophyte infections and ketoconazole is a safe alternative to griseofulvin if intolerance or allergy to griseofulvin exists.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary Twenty‐seven patients with various dermatophyte infections took part in a double blind study. Thirteen patients were given ketoconazole 200 mg daily and 14 griseofulvin 500 mg daily for up to 60 days. Following ketoconazole therapy, 12 of 13 patients were healed, with minimal lesions in one. In the griseofulvin‐treated group ten of 14 were healed, three having minimal residual lesions and one was a treatment failure. There was a tendency for T. rubrum infections to respond more completely to ketoconazole treatment. At six‐month follow up there was one griseofulvin‐treated failure and one relapse while there were three ketoconazole relapses. It is concluded that both ketoconazole and griseofulvin are effective in treating dermatophyte infections and ketoconazole is a safe alternative to griseofulvin if intolerance or allergy to griseofulvin exists.

Key concepts: Griseofulvin, Ketoconazole, Dermatophyte, Medicine, Dermatology, Antifungal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A DOUBLE BLIND TRIAL OF KETOCONAZOLE VERSUS GRISEOFULVIN TREATMENT FOR DERMATOPHYTE INFECTIONS — Research Paper | ScholarLens