Gender Bias in Teacher Education Texts
Karen Zittleman, David Sadker
Abstract
Karen Zittleman, David Sadker
Abstract
This content analysis investigated the treatment of gender in 23 teacher education textbooks published between 1998 and 2001. Given the decades of research documenting the impact of gender bias in schools, the authors anticipated stronger, fairer texts than those analyzed 20 years ago. Clearly, there has been progress, but it is minimal. Introductory/foundation texts provide slightly more than 7% of content to gender issues; methods texts average little more than 1%. Although a commitment to gender fairness is verbalized in several of these texts, specific resources and strategies to achieve that goal are often absent. Inadequate, stereotypic, and even inaccurate treatment of gender is commonplace. Tomorrow’s teachers may learn the importance of verbalizing support for equity without the expectation that they can actually help make it a reality.
OpenAlex reports 74 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This content analysis investigated the treatment of gender in 23 teacher education textbooks published between 1998 and 2001. Given the decades of research documenting the impact of gender bias in schools, the authors anticipated stronger, fairer texts than those analyzed 20 years ago. Clearly, there has been progress, but it is minimal. Introductory/foundation texts provide slightly more than 7% of content to gender issues; methods texts average little more than 1%. Although a commitment to gender fairness is verbalized in several of these texts, specific resources and strategies to achieve that goal are often absent. Inadequate, stereotypic, and even inaccurate treatment of gender is commonplace. Tomorrow’s teachers may learn the importance of verbalizing support for equity without the expectation that they can actually help make it a reality.
Key concepts: Gender equity, Gender bias, Psychology, Content analysis, Equity (law), Foundation (evidence), Content (measure theory), Pedagogy