2009•The Heart Surgery ForumOpen access

Postoperative Pericardial Effusion and Posterior Pericardiotomy, Related or Not?

Ali Reza Bakhshandeh, Mehrdad Salehi, Hasan Radmehr, Roya Sattarzadeh, Ahmad Reza Nasr, Amir Hosein Sadeghpour

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Large pericardial effusions after cardiac surgery develop in 30% of patients and reach their maximum size on approximately day 10 postoperatively. Tamponade develops in approximately 1% of patients with large pericardial effusions. Effusion may be prevented by posterior pericardiotomy, but its role and possible adverse consequences are controversial. We sought to further investigate the effectiveness of this technique. METHOD: This prospective randomized case-control study was carried out on 410 patients, mean age 68.4 +/- 9.2 years, who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery alone or combined with valve surgery during the period between April 2005 and May 2006. A 4-cm longitudinal incision was made parallel and posterior to the phrenic nerve in the pericardiotomy group. Echocardiographic study was performed at the time of discharge and 15 and 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: After 15 and 30 days postsurgery, respectively, 178 (90.2%) and 192 (97%) of patients from the pericardiotomy group and none from the conventional group were free of effusion (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Posterior pericardiotomy is easy to perform and is a safe and effective means to prevent postoperative effusion and its early and delayed adverse consequences.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: Large pericardial effusions after cardiac surgery develop in 30% of patients and reach their maximum size on approximately day 10 postoperatively. Tamponade develops in approximately 1% of patients with large pericardial effusions. Effusion may be prevented by posterior pericardiotomy, but its role and possible adverse consequences are controversial. We sought to further investigate the effectiveness of this technique. METHOD: This prospective randomized case-control study was carried out on 410 patients, mean age 68.4 +/- 9.2 years, who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery alone or combined with valve surgery during the period between April 2005 and May 2006. A 4-cm longitudinal incision was made parallel and posterior to the phrenic nerve in the pericardiotomy group. Echocardiographic study was performed at the time of discharge and 15 and 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: After 15 and 30 days postsurgery, respectively, 178 (90.2%) and 192 (97%) of patients from the pericardiotomy group and none from the conventional group were free of effusion (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Posterior pericardiotomy is easy to perform and is a safe and effective means to prevent postoperative effusion and its early and delayed adverse consequences.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: Large pericardial effusions after cardiac surgery develop in 30% of patients and reach their maximum size on approximately day 10 postoperatively. Tamponade develops in approximately 1% of patients with large pericardial effusions. Effusion may be prevented by posterior pericardiotomy, but its role and possible adverse consequences are controversial. We sought to further investigate the effectiveness of this technique. METHOD: This prospective randomized case-control study was carried out on 410 patients, mean age 68.4 +/- 9.2 years, who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery alone or combined with valve surgery during the period between April 2005 and May 2006. A 4-cm longitudinal incision was made parallel and posterior to the phrenic nerve in the pericardiotomy group. Echocardiographic study was performed at the time of discharge and 15 and 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: After 15 and 30 days postsurgery, respectively, 178 (90.2%) and 192 (97%) of patients from the pericardiotomy group and none from the conventional group were free of effusion (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Posterior pericardiotomy is easy to perform and is a safe and effective means to prevent postoperative effusion and its early and delayed adverse consequences.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pericardial effusion, Surgery, Effusion, Tamponade, Cardiac tamponade, Cardiac surgery, Adverse effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Postoperative Pericardial Effusion and Posterior Pericardiotomy, Related or Not? — Research Paper | ScholarLens