Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study: Table 1
Hilary Hearnshaw
Abstract
Open-access reader
Hilary Hearnshaw
Abstract
Open-access reader
autopsies and organ retention.Parents should be provided with full information and not be coerced into accepting an autopsy examination, and these discussions should be with an appropriately trained professional.Our study provides important information for parents.If a termination has been carried out because of anomalies detected by ultrasound scan, by declining an autopsy, parents will remain ignorant of information that might change the recurrence risk in one in four cases and have a one in 13 chance for missing confirmation of a high (one in four) recurrence risk.We thank CA Boyd for advice and reading the manuscript and S Gould and C Bowker (paediatric pathologists), A Roberts (specialist genetics nurse), S Hanson (data systems manager), and all the staff in the Oxford Prenatal Diagnosis Unit for help and for providing information.
OpenAlex reports 121 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
autopsies and organ retention.Parents should be provided with full information and not be coerced into accepting an autopsy examination, and these discussions should be with an appropriately trained professional.Our study provides important information for parents.If a termination has been carried out because of anomalies detected by ultrasound scan, by declining an autopsy, parents will remain ignorant of information that might change the recurrence risk in one in four cases and have a one in 13 chance for missing confirmation of a high (one in four) recurrence risk.We thank CA Boyd for advice and reading the manuscript and S Gould and C Bowker (paediatric pathologists), A Roberts (specialist genetics nurse), S Hanson (data systems manager), and all the staff in the Oxford Prenatal Diagnosis Unit for help and for providing information.
Key concepts: Declaration of Helsinki, Research ethics, Helsinki declaration, Ethics committee, Declaration, Protocol (science), Clinical trial, Informed consent