2004BMJOpen access

Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study: Table 1

Hilary Hearnshaw

Open full text 121 citations

Abstract

autopsies and organ retention.Parents should be provided with full information and not be coerced into accepting an autopsy examination, and these discussions should be with an appropriately trained professional.Our study provides important information for parents.If a termination has been carried out because of anomalies detected by ultrasound scan, by declining an autopsy, parents will remain ignorant of information that might change the recurrence risk in one in four cases and have a one in 13 chance for missing confirmation of a high (one in four) recurrence risk.We thank CA Boyd for advice and reading the manuscript and S Gould and C Bowker (paediatric pathologists), A Roberts (specialist genetics nurse), S Hanson (data systems manager), and all the staff in the Oxford Prenatal Diagnosis Unit for help and for providing information.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

autopsies and organ retention.Parents should be provided with full information and not be coerced into accepting an autopsy examination, and these discussions should be with an appropriately trained professional.Our study provides important information for parents.If a termination has been carried out because of anomalies detected by ultrasound scan, by declining an autopsy, parents will remain ignorant of information that might change the recurrence risk in one in four cases and have a one in 13 chance for missing confirmation of a high (one in four) recurrence risk.We thank CA Boyd for advice and reading the manuscript and S Gould and C Bowker (paediatric pathologists), A Roberts (specialist genetics nurse), S Hanson (data systems manager), and all the staff in the Oxford Prenatal Diagnosis Unit for help and for providing information.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 121 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

autopsies and organ retention.Parents should be provided with full information and not be coerced into accepting an autopsy examination, and these discussions should be with an appropriately trained professional.Our study provides important information for parents.If a termination has been carried out because of anomalies detected by ultrasound scan, by declining an autopsy, parents will remain ignorant of information that might change the recurrence risk in one in four cases and have a one in 13 chance for missing confirmation of a high (one in four) recurrence risk.We thank CA Boyd for advice and reading the manuscript and S Gould and C Bowker (paediatric pathologists), A Roberts (specialist genetics nurse), S Hanson (data systems manager), and all the staff in the Oxford Prenatal Diagnosis Unit for help and for providing information.

Key concepts: Declaration of Helsinki, Research ethics, Helsinki declaration, Ethics committee, Declaration, Protocol (science), Clinical trial, Informed consent

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study: Table 1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens