2008Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIERequires access

Formal representation of geographic ontology and its application in map services

Maojun Huang

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Geographic ontology is a very complex and intricate concept. As a philosophical concept, ontology has the most ambiguous meanings. In the paper, firstly the concept of geographic ontology is explored and the three meanings of geographic ontology are put forward: philosophy ontology, information ontology and spatial ontology. Then it introduces some ontology representation languages and concludes by suggesting OWL as the appropriate language for building geographic ontology. But geographic ontology is quite distinct from the general information ontology in that it should represent spatial properties as well as attribute properties. Unfortunately, OWL cannot describe spatial properties and spatial relations of geographic ontology because they are mainly for representing the general information ontology. It puts forward to build some formal axioms about spatial properties of geographic ontology by use of three theoretical tools: mereology, location theory and topology. With these axioms, we can formally represent geographic ontology with spatial properties. Finally, it shows how we can use geographic ontology to describe map services and to improve the quality of map services.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Geographic ontology is a very complex and intricate concept. As a philosophical concept, ontology has the most ambiguous meanings. In the paper, firstly the concept of geographic ontology is explored and the three meanings of geographic ontology are put forward: philosophy ontology, information ontology and spatial ontology. Then it introduces some ontology representation languages and concludes by suggesting OWL as the appropriate language for building geographic ontology. But geographic ontology is quite distinct from the general information ontology in that it should represent spatial properties as well as attribute properties. Unfortunately, OWL cannot describe spatial properties and spatial relations of geographic ontology because they are mainly for representing the general information ontology. It puts forward to build some formal axioms about spatial properties of geographic ontology by use of three theoretical tools: mereology, location theory and topology. With these axioms, we can formally represent geographic ontology with spatial properties. Finally, it shows how we can use geographic ontology to describe map services and to improve the quality of map services.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Geographic ontology is a very complex and intricate concept. As a philosophical concept, ontology has the most ambiguous meanings. In the paper, firstly the concept of geographic ontology is explored and the three meanings of geographic ontology are put forward: philosophy ontology, information ontology and spatial ontology. Then it introduces some ontology representation languages and concludes by suggesting OWL as the appropriate language for building geographic ontology. But geographic ontology is quite distinct from the general information ontology in that it should represent spatial properties as well as attribute properties. Unfortunately, OWL cannot describe spatial properties and spatial relations of geographic ontology because they are mainly for representing the general information ontology. It puts forward to build some formal axioms about spatial properties of geographic ontology by use of three theoretical tools: mereology, location theory and topology. With these axioms, we can formally represent geographic ontology with spatial properties. Finally, it shows how we can use geographic ontology to describe map services and to improve the quality of map services.

Key concepts: Ontology, Upper ontology, Ontology-based data integration, Process ontology, Computer science, Suggested Upper Merged Ontology, Information retrieval, Formal ontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Formal representation of geographic ontology and its application in map services — Research Paper | ScholarLens