World Health Organization quality assessment programme on HIV testing
Jeremy John Saxon Snell, E M Supran, José Esparza, Hiko Tamashiro
Abstract
Jeremy John Saxon Snell, E M Supran, José Esparza, Hiko Tamashiro
Abstract
A serum panel comprising 19 samples of known (five positives and 14 negatives) but undisclosed HIV-1-antibody content was distributed to 30 national reference laboratories for HIV serology. In order to simulate normal circumstances of referral, participants were asked to test the panel for HIV-1-antibody status using their normal procedures. Results of testing were returned by 28 participants. There were great variations in the number and combinations of tests used. The number used ranged from one to five assays per laboratory and none of the 24 laboratories using two or more tests employed the same combination. A high average success rate of 99% was seen with the positive samples. More errors occurred with the negative samples, with an average of 87% correct negative reports. Only four of the 14 negative specimens were reported as negative by all participants.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A serum panel comprising 19 samples of known (five positives and 14 negatives) but undisclosed HIV-1-antibody content was distributed to 30 national reference laboratories for HIV serology. In order to simulate normal circumstances of referral, participants were asked to test the panel for HIV-1-antibody status using their normal procedures. Results of testing were returned by 28 participants. There were great variations in the number and combinations of tests used. The number used ranged from one to five assays per laboratory and none of the 24 laboratories using two or more tests employed the same combination. A high average success rate of 99% was seen with the positive samples. More errors occurred with the negative samples, with an average of 87% correct negative reports. Only four of the 14 negative specimens were reported as negative by all participants.
Key concepts: Medicine, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), False positive paradox, External quality assessment, Serology, Referral, False Negative Reactions, Internal medicine