1990•AIDSRequires access

World Health Organization quality assessment programme on HIV testing

Jeremy John Saxon Snell, E M Supran, José Esparza, Hiko Tamashiro

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

A serum panel comprising 19 samples of known (five positives and 14 negatives) but undisclosed HIV-1-antibody content was distributed to 30 national reference laboratories for HIV serology. In order to simulate normal circumstances of referral, participants were asked to test the panel for HIV-1-antibody status using their normal procedures. Results of testing were returned by 28 participants. There were great variations in the number and combinations of tests used. The number used ranged from one to five assays per laboratory and none of the 24 laboratories using two or more tests employed the same combination. A high average success rate of 99% was seen with the positive samples. More errors occurred with the negative samples, with an average of 87% correct negative reports. Only four of the 14 negative specimens were reported as negative by all participants.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A serum panel comprising 19 samples of known (five positives and 14 negatives) but undisclosed HIV-1-antibody content was distributed to 30 national reference laboratories for HIV serology. In order to simulate normal circumstances of referral, participants were asked to test the panel for HIV-1-antibody status using their normal procedures. Results of testing were returned by 28 participants. There were great variations in the number and combinations of tests used. The number used ranged from one to five assays per laboratory and none of the 24 laboratories using two or more tests employed the same combination. A high average success rate of 99% was seen with the positive samples. More errors occurred with the negative samples, with an average of 87% correct negative reports. Only four of the 14 negative specimens were reported as negative by all participants.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A serum panel comprising 19 samples of known (five positives and 14 negatives) but undisclosed HIV-1-antibody content was distributed to 30 national reference laboratories for HIV serology. In order to simulate normal circumstances of referral, participants were asked to test the panel for HIV-1-antibody status using their normal procedures. Results of testing were returned by 28 participants. There were great variations in the number and combinations of tests used. The number used ranged from one to five assays per laboratory and none of the 24 laboratories using two or more tests employed the same combination. A high average success rate of 99% was seen with the positive samples. More errors occurred with the negative samples, with an average of 87% correct negative reports. Only four of the 14 negative specimens were reported as negative by all participants.

Key concepts: Medicine, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), False positive paradox, External quality assessment, Serology, Referral, False Negative Reactions, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
World Health Organization quality assessment programme on HIV testing — Research Paper | ScholarLens